All,
I had a recipe that Beersmith pegged as a SG of 1.070. It also stated that it was estimated at 9.5% abv. I went to the lhbs on Saturday and gave them the ingredients and asked them if I needed to pitch two yeasts because of the FG to be on the safe side. The guy immediately said "that's not a 9.5% beer". He did some calculations and it came out to about 5.5%.
I went ahead and brewed the recipe today, but I came out with a 1.050 as an FG, so I figure that's going to be about a 5.5% beer. Is missing the FG bad, or how in the world did Beersmith come out with that high of alcohol content when it was clearly wrong?
Grains used:
11.5 lbs 2 Row
1.5 lbs Munich malt
.5 lbs carapils
.5 lbs crystal 60
Thanks!
I had a recipe that Beersmith pegged as a SG of 1.070. It also stated that it was estimated at 9.5% abv. I went to the lhbs on Saturday and gave them the ingredients and asked them if I needed to pitch two yeasts because of the FG to be on the safe side. The guy immediately said "that's not a 9.5% beer". He did some calculations and it came out to about 5.5%.
I went ahead and brewed the recipe today, but I came out with a 1.050 as an FG, so I figure that's going to be about a 5.5% beer. Is missing the FG bad, or how in the world did Beersmith come out with that high of alcohol content when it was clearly wrong?
Grains used:
11.5 lbs 2 Row
1.5 lbs Munich malt
.5 lbs carapils
.5 lbs crystal 60
Thanks!