Desmond Dekker. He came first.
The Israelites by Desmond Dekker gets alot of play on my old seeburg jukebox.
Desmond Dekker. He came first.
The Israelites by Desmond Dekker gets alot of play on my old seeburg jukebox.
I'm not knocking one of the best rock/blues players, but this is about BANDS. This disqualifies a lot of great artists who were solo acts.
This is a hard topic because there are so many bands who were awesome for their own thing. One may be fantastic at songwriting, another for passion, another for fun...
I think the one thing they all have in common is that they were greatest when they were young. I think growing old limits your ability to create and express yourself. You start wanting to preach ideals and can't seem to "let go" like you could when you were young.
or maybe it's because they are usually off drugs by that time...
Let's see, he toured with a drummer, a bass player, usually a keyboardist, and often a brass section.. And that's not a 'band'.... I get it, so you mean bands that were not named after their front man?
I guess that leaves out bands like Dio, Dokken, Lynch Mob, clapton, etc?
LOL.. What the hell kind of logic is that?
PS.. IMO, Gary's best work was his last album, "SCARS".. That guy got better and better with age...
Enter your email address to join: