augiedoggy
Well-Known Member
To put it bluntly, What you want required a lot of effort and extra cost for Zero benefit in this configuration. This is because one element is only used when the boil or strike water is being heated and 100% is needed from that element as a "base" of power... the other element with the controller does the fine tune overall heat level in all other situations. (similiar to the second element in all the repurposed hotwater urn systems like the grainfather and mashand boil and the like.)I full understand what you're saying and that i would only NEED one element plugged into a controller. I was wondering if there was any way to get what i WANT.
I suppose their current solution would work just fine tho. Can the kettle be modified by unibrau? I think I would like the temp sensor in the kettle as apposed to their solution. (i want one more hole an tc fitting)
With 2 1600w elements you actually dont need a controller at all for the boil or for heating strike water. (or at all unless your recirculating the mash and directly maintaining temps of it )
Both running at 100% would produce a decent but not overly strong boil. the fact that the power for each element needs to come from different circuits means separate wiring for each. Yes its easy enough to tie them together with two ssrs controlled by one pid or in this case stc1000 thermostat. but the final result would not be beneficial for anything.
If you really wanted both elements to have controllers just buy a inkbird IPB16 prebuild pid controller with temp probe and alarm for $100...
https://www.ebay.com/itm/INKBIRD-Wi...gFas2Zi:sc:ShippingMethodStandard!14120!US!-1
Its a real pid which if anything, would perform better anyway.
Last edited: