TC tee inner diameter

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

swanwick

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2010
Messages
181
Reaction score
12
Location
DC
I am going to be connecting from a vessel's TC port to a TC tee and then from the other two sides of the Tee to TC's with 5/8" barbs for 1/2" hosing.

Does it matter what the ID (inner diameter) on the TC tee is as long as it is at least 5/8" (or probably 3/4" since the ID of the barb is probably 3/4"). It seems that most for sale have >5/8" ID.

I know it is strange not to have a ball valve in the equation, but one is the Herms Input and the other is the HLT input (above liquid level). They are both connected to a pump output that has a ball valve. Long story, but I am trying to automate and I only have so many outputs from the controller (uniflex) I can use to control automated valves so I have to conserve.
  • TC Tee 1 (HERMS input)......side 1 is mash re-circ and side 2 is sparge
  • TC Tee 2 (HLT input)......side 1 is from the filter after garden hose and side 2 is HLT re-circ
Note: for sparging I could go straight to Mash Tun rather than through HERMS to get to Mash Tun, but this way, it saves having to clean out the HERMS coil after brewing.

OK, sorry that went a little off the rails. Even if you are not 3 vessel HERMS, the first two paragraphs of the post are still hopefully answerable.....I was just trying to give context. Happy to share my valve/hose diagrams for anyone that is interested.
 
Joined
Jul 17, 2012
Messages
3,207
Reaction score
671
Location
Eagleville
I’d say it wouldn’t matter. Any T I have seen was larger inner diameter than 5/8 or even 3/4 for that matter. But I am referring to 1.5” TC Tee. If you’re talking a smaller diameter TC T than disregard my post.
 
OP
OP
swanwick

swanwick

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2010
Messages
181
Reaction score
12
Location
DC
I’d say it wouldn’t matter. Any T I have seen was larger inner diameter than 5/8 or even 3/4 for that matter. But I am referring to 1.5” TC Tee. If you’re talking a smaller diameter TC T than disregard my post.
All that specificity that I was trying to provide and I forgot the most important spec! :( Yes, talking about 1.5" TC connections. Thx.
 

mattd2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Messages
3,841
Reaction score
385
Location
NZ
Wall thickness of sanitary tube is normally 1/16" so the 1.5" tee will have an ID of 1.375".

The only issue with mismatching IDs like this is depending on how it is arranged (most issues are with horizontal piping) is the larger tube may not completely drain, or air can get trapped in the top of the tube.
 

Bobby_M

Vendor and Brewer
HBT Sponsor
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
27,420
Reaction score
8,159
Location
Whitehouse Station, NJ
Wall thickness of sanitary tube is normally 1/16" so the 1.5" tee will have an ID of 1.375".

The only issue with mismatching IDs like this is depending on how it is arranged (most issues are with horizontal piping) is the larger tube may not completely drain, or air can get trapped in the top of the tube.
A bit late to the thread, but since you brought it up, I can clarify some things. I think the OP is generally referring to the typical flange size for a 1.5" sanitary piping system which measures 2" across. A tee that is compatible with that flange does typically use 1.5" OD tubing on all straight legs of the tee, but that's just the assumed standard. There are several other iterations available now. For example, a 1" TC TEE also uses the 2" actual diameter flanges. I also make a reduced tube version all the way down to 3/4" OD with the same flanges to make larger manifold assemblies have less trapped fluids but still retaining the most ubiquitous flange size. We also do it with elbows and crosses.

1698548251514.png
1698548274774.png
 
Top