donbarbucio
Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 0
Bad flavorless beer or not, its reasonable when stuffing your face full of obscene amounts of food. Long live our home brew though!
Marc77 said:As someone else said, the nice thing about cheap beer is that you can drink the hell out of it. When my college friends and I get together for a beer they'd make fun of me because I'd only have one or two craft beers (8 to 10%). But when we all got together and drank at a game or some get together I'd drink them under the table when I resorted to drinking that swill.
Miller Lite is good in Saki Bombs.
Bud Lite is the most drinkable of the 3 IMHO.
meltroha said:They are well made, just well made pieces of crap. I would love to work for them to learn how to brew though, they certainly have the technique down.
this **** is so annoying. coors light tastes good. better than most ****ty homebrew with ten thousand malts, four pounds of hops, and fermented for three months at 70 degrees
most homebrew doesn't taste good. ask any bjcp judge. most homebrewers could learn a lot from coors light, if they would look past their own biases.
progmac said:most homebrew doesn't taste good. ask any bjcp judge. most homebrewers could learn a lot from coors light, if they would look past their own biases.
there are a lot of interesting discussions on here. the light beer circlejerks are not among them. you're right in that i should have stayed out of this one.If home brew taste that bad to you. Why are you on a HOMEBREW talk forum? I'm a little confused at that one.
Actually I drank something last night I consider worse than Coors. I had a Stella and it was disgusting. Given I had just finished one of my own lagers, but that Stella was terrible and tasted disgustingly stale.
To play devils advocate, Coors actually knows more about brewing than almost everyone on this forumn can hope to know (unless your a person who has a PHD in brewing science, biology, and engineering)
the knowledge, technology, and skill that goes into making that stuff is beyond anything you would ever believe.
I dare anyone here to make a beer as bland and flavorless as Coors that matches its specs perfectly.
That being said, I hate the stuff myself. But I still give respect for brewing skill where its due.
Id also recommend anyone who likes the AAL for what it is (light, easy to drink, bland drink), to go for a Narragansett. At least their AAL tastes pretty nice.
Actually I drank something last night I consider worse than Coors. I had a Stella and it was disgusting. Given I had just finished one of my own lagers, but that Stella was terrible and tasted disgustingly stale.
Actually I drank something last night I consider worse than Coors. I had a Stella and it was disgusting. Given I had just finished one of my own lagers, but that Stella was terrible and tasted disgustingly stale.
progmac said:this **** is so annoying. coors light tastes good. better than most ****ty homebrew with ten thousand malts, four pounds of hops, and fermented for three months at 70 degrees
will_rouse said:If home brew taste that bad to you. Why are you on a HOMEBREW talk forum? I'm a little confused at that one.
"Homebrew" doesn't taste bad. "Bad homebrew" tastes bad. And there's a lot of it out there.
My early brews weren't good. After 6 1/2 years of practice, of refining my processes, of constantly striving for improvement, I think the quality of what I put out now is up there with respectable craft breweries.
But if my beer still tasted like the swill I made 6 1/2 years ago, I wouldn't still be brewing.
Yep. There's a lot of bad homebrew out there. I'll bet if you forced most BJCP judges to choose between drinking a six-pack of Coors Light or a six-pack of a competition beer selected completely at random, they'd probably take the Coors!
In the UK, they call Stella "wife beater"...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-494149/Where-did-wrong-beer-wife-beater.html
Gonna take a lot of marketing dollars to fix that one!
Enter your email address to join: