I've read a few posts about rehydrating the yeast before you add it. I've only made one batch, it was a Russian imperial stout and I just spread it over the top. Is it better to rehydrate it first?
I put a couple hundred Ml of spring water in my flask & nuke it to about 90F, checking it with my All-Temp laser thermometer. It's pretty handy for checking temps in the flask or fermenter right through the side. Then sprinkle in the yeast to sit covered with sanitized plastic for 15 minutes per manufacturer's directions. Then sanitize a skewer to stir it in to sit another 15 minutes or so. Pitching it at high krausen also seems to make it get through the reproductive (lag) phases a bit faster. I've had some dry yeasts like S-04 start visibly fermenting in about 3 hours this way. Finished once & clearing in 10 days.
"high krausen" means it is fermenting with sugar.
You don't want to make a malt starter with dry yeast.
Just rehydrate with water per the directions on the package.
Rehydrate! Use 25mL of water per gram of yeast (not RO or DI) at 104F. After 10 minutes, add wort in the same quantity as your rehydration water and wait 20 minutes, you should see yeast activity at this point. Keep adding wort (using the same amount as your first addition) until the rehydrated yeast temp and your wort temp are within 10F of each other, then pitch.
For optimum fermentation consider using about .2 ppm of zinc in your fermenter.
It seems to cut lag time till visible fermentation & finishes faster or at least more completely in my opinion.I'm a firm believer in reading the manual.
My thinking is that the companies creating dry yeast have expended some considerable efforts to deliver an optimal product and supply very clear guidelines for their use.
It requires minimal effort on my part to follow the instructions to get the best from their product. If the veracity of the science behind rehydration is to be taken at face value; and I see no reason to doubt it, rehydration is likely to result in a more optimal fermentation.
Isn't that desirable?
I've found that it definitely cuts lag time & makes for a steadier fermentation.Just to really confuse things, a rep from Fermentis told my LHBS guy (who also owns/operates a local brewery) that you can do it either way and that he personally pitches dry. That threw me for a loop because I had always rehydrated. Since hearing this, I have brewed several batches each way with no discernible differences in FG or flavor. I did not, however, do a split batch with any of them. All that being said, I have gone back to rehydrating because 1) it really isn't that hard, 2) it doesn't hurt, and 3) it may help.
Just to really confuse things, a rep from Fermentis told my LHBS guy (who also owns/operates a local brewery) that you can do it either way and that he personally pitches dry. That threw me for a loop because I had always rehydrated. Since hearing this, I have brewed several batches each way with no discernible differences in FG or flavor. I did not, however, do a split batch with any of them. All that being said, I have gone back to rehydrating because 1) it really isn't that hard, 2) it doesn't hurt, and 3) it may help.
Just to really confuse things, a rep from Fermentis told my LHBS guy (who also owns/operates a local brewery) that you can do it either way and that he personally pitches dry.
Just to really confuse things, a rep from Fermentis told my LHBS guy (who also owns/operates a local brewery) that you can do it either way and that he personally pitches dry. That threw me for a loop because I had always rehydrated. Since hearing this, I have brewed several batches each way with no discernible differences in FG or flavor. I did not, however, do a split batch with any of them. All that being said, I have gone back to rehydrating because 1) it really isn't that hard, 2) it doesn't hurt, and 3) it may help.