• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Reducing HCO3

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

amschind

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2016
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm from Galveston Texas. I have two broad questions, but bear with some background information first:

2016 Water report:
Ca 2+ 37
Mg 2+ 7
HCO3 - 127
SO4 2- 38
Na + 37
Cl - 51
pH 8.1 (their measurement)
pH 7 (my presumably much less accurate measurement at the faucet)

I only brew saisons, and an all wheat saison at that. Previously I just bought an 80/20 mix of dH2O and spring water and called it good. Efficiency was marginal at best despite LONG step mashes.

I finally decided to try tap water and just put a batch in the fermenter using 12 gal of tap water with a campden tablet and dH2O for the sparge. Efficiency was much better, ~80%, though the use of hot sparge water vs no sparge is a variable that caused all if not most of that improvement vs prior batches.

So on to my two questions:

1.) If I can consistently get 80% efficiency using tap water and a single campden tablet followed by a bit of heat, am I a fool for trying to modify the pH?

2.) If the answer to (1) is "yes, it'll help, do it" or "you're a fool and it won't help, but go ahead", then how do I go about it? I used the Bru'n Water spreadsheet and came out with 7.5ml of 85% phosphoric acid to treat 15 gallons (12 mash, 3 sparge). Looking over the forum threads, that seems like more than people are using (or, more to the point, it's the same volume that other folks are using for far more dilute H3PO4 solutions). I wanted to check the calculated value against collective experience before I wind up with a pot full of hot water at pH 2.

Further, I have read VERY mixed opinions about the effect that this will have on my calcium. 37 seems fine, but if I precipitate it all out with the phosphoric acid, then I have to add anions that I don't want to get it back. It appears that Palmer maintains that the phosphate will all wind up as some kind of apatite on the bottom of my kettle while others seems to think that my calcium won't change at all. I wanted to see if anyone could clarify that.

Second, it seems that lactic acid is looked down upon for acidification of the strike water. However, I am curious as to why any lactate would be left when you actually drink the beer? Presuming that it's added well before yeast go anywhere near the wort (i.e as a strike water modification like we're discussing here rather than to the fermenter to make a fake lacto beer), and that the wort is well oxygenated before pitching, won't the yeast eat some/most/all of the lactate? I gather that they can't metabolize lactate when they themselves are fermenting to ethanol, but with oxygen as an electron acceptor, can't they metabolize anything? I guess the only counter argument is that they'll still be preferentially chewing through the sugar when they run out of O2, though I wanted community experience to weigh in on that as well.

Best, Adam
 
If you keep the pH low (mash pH) there will be no precipitation of calcium. I suppose that's an argument for treating the water to mash pH before mashing which has been discussed here fairly extensively recently. There is a series of charts in the back of the Palmer book that go into levels at which calcium precipitates as a function of pH given alkalinity. You will see that if pH is kept low it takes a lot of hardness to start precipitation.

As maltsters regularly obtain 80% yield using distilled water for their test mashes I don't think you can blame using decarbonated water for reduced efficiency. Look elsewhere for that. Also note that we remove bicarbonate in order to acheive better mash pH but the criterion on which 'better' is based is flavor - not efficiency. As home brewers we don't really care about efficiency as we can always spring an extra buck for an extra pound of grain. It is the best tasting beer we want and that depends on proper mash pH and hence liquor alkalinity control.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with lactic acid. It is often commented that phosphoric acid is more flavor neutral and it is but some prefer a bit of lactic flavor. Home brewers finally seem to be becoming aware that the flavors associated with vehicles for lactic acid such as sauermalz and sauergut lend desirable flavors to some beers (continental lagers).
 
Thanks for the replies. I put down a large post on another thread in which I worked through the math on phosphoric acid; long story short, it seems that even at the calculated concentration, I won't be making a large change in the phosphorus concentration.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top