airbrett
Well-Known Member
My first brew is currently bottle conditioning and I am ready to plan the next brew. I want to used relatively the same partial mash recipe with a few modifications to compare the end result (such as only doing a primary fermentation, etc.).
The partial mash recipe will involve 2 lbs or pale malt grain and 6 lbs of extract and this will all be done on my gas stovetop.
Tell my if this plan sounds sane - it is partially inspired by the DeathBrewer tutorial in the sticky:
I will heat the strike water to the planned strike temp, turn the burner off, then put the grains directly in the water and cover. After the planned mash time (45 mins) I will then pour this into the kettle (that already has water heated to 180) using a grain bag or a metal colander to catch the grains. To sparge, I will use the pour over method of heated sparge water I have put aside, or a combo of that and tea-bagging if I use a grain bag.
My rationale is that by having the grain completely in the strike water I would get more efficiency.
1) Does this method sound like a good one?
2) Water volume for the mash: I've read about sparge water volume here: http://www.howtobrew.com/section3/chapter14-6.html. "A thinner mash of >2 quarts of water per pound of grain dilutes the relative concentration of the enzymes, slowing the conversion, but ultimately leads to a more fermentable mash because the enzymes are not inhibited by a high concentration of sugars." Is that a bad thing or does it mean I would have to wait too long for the conversion (> 45 minutes) and suffer more temperature drop?
3) I'm using San Francisco sierra snowmelt tap water that has a high PH of around 9 and almost no calcium. I want to add gypsum, but given the stove top method, removing the lid from the mash to test the PH mid-cycle would release too much heat. Any ideas on estimating the amount of gypsum to add to the strike water ahead of time and/or the kettle water? I'd lean toward being conservative as many brew just fine with regular SF tap water.
SF water chemistry: http://sfwater.org/index.aspx?page=...ntent=language-en&utm_campaign=qualitymatters
The partial mash recipe will involve 2 lbs or pale malt grain and 6 lbs of extract and this will all be done on my gas stovetop.
Tell my if this plan sounds sane - it is partially inspired by the DeathBrewer tutorial in the sticky:
I will heat the strike water to the planned strike temp, turn the burner off, then put the grains directly in the water and cover. After the planned mash time (45 mins) I will then pour this into the kettle (that already has water heated to 180) using a grain bag or a metal colander to catch the grains. To sparge, I will use the pour over method of heated sparge water I have put aside, or a combo of that and tea-bagging if I use a grain bag.
My rationale is that by having the grain completely in the strike water I would get more efficiency.
1) Does this method sound like a good one?
2) Water volume for the mash: I've read about sparge water volume here: http://www.howtobrew.com/section3/chapter14-6.html. "A thinner mash of >2 quarts of water per pound of grain dilutes the relative concentration of the enzymes, slowing the conversion, but ultimately leads to a more fermentable mash because the enzymes are not inhibited by a high concentration of sugars." Is that a bad thing or does it mean I would have to wait too long for the conversion (> 45 minutes) and suffer more temperature drop?
3) I'm using San Francisco sierra snowmelt tap water that has a high PH of around 9 and almost no calcium. I want to add gypsum, but given the stove top method, removing the lid from the mash to test the PH mid-cycle would release too much heat. Any ideas on estimating the amount of gypsum to add to the strike water ahead of time and/or the kettle water? I'd lean toward being conservative as many brew just fine with regular SF tap water.
SF water chemistry: http://sfwater.org/index.aspx?page=...ntent=language-en&utm_campaign=qualitymatters