Aaw man,it blew the bottom out?
Yeah. Luckily I have a bunch more.
Jcmccoy: It wasn't water for sterilization, it was sterile water for the brew. Obviously I should've let it cool first.
Aaw man,it blew the bottom out?
I figured out that I was taking gravity readings of the bottom sludge, not the actual wort. Derp. I bottled it Sunday. I've got terrible patience so I opened one today. It's good! A bit flat, but good. Much hoppier than I expected, but that's good too. And I didn't even chill it.
If it was stable for a few days then bottle bombs should not be an issue - I did not understand this from what you said above.
But you should know that predicted FGs can be way off and until you fine tune your set-up with particular regard also to yeast strain and ingredients, you should never rely on a predicted FG to tell you a batch is done fermenting.
If it was stable for a few days then bottle bombs should not be an issue - I did not understand this from what you said above.
But you should know that predicted FGs can be way off and until you fine tune your set-up with particular regard also to yeast strain and ingredients, you should never rely on a predicted FG to tell you a batch is done fermenting.
This. Don't use Beersmith's predicted FG, it frankly blows and doesn't take into account mash temp, use of extract, etc. Even the yeasts attenuation rates are often screwy.
If you really want to know in advance your FG, you have to do a fast ferment: you take a small portion of wort, overpitch, ferment high and check the gravity of that after a few days. And even this test isn't always accurate because your real fermentation could very well attenuate less because you haven't overpitched or fermented high. It's more a measure of the overall fermentable sugars in the wort than a be all end all prediction of FG. FG stability for an extended period of time is pretty much the only way to know for sure the beer is done.