• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Obnoxious Football Trash Talk Thread

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
You should all have a great weekend since there's no chance of your teams getting whipped by the Seahawks. You deserve at least one week of peace before your seasons end in disappointment.
 
You should all have a great weekend since there's no chance of your teams getting whipped by the Seahawks. You deserve at least one week of peace before your seasons end in disappointment.

the saints will crush the hawks once sporles is back. The pathers will at least win one game against them, and that just embarrassing
 
the saints will crush the hawks once sporles is back. The pathers will at least win one game against them, and that just embarrassing

Buahahahahaha there can only be on mighty midget that makes a difference next Monday
 
hoppyhoppyhippo said:
Falcons always play the Saints hard. If the Falcons offense could have finished drives they would have won. The Saints saw less of the ball.

So, you mean if the Falcons had scored more points, they would have won?

That's the kid of dynamite analysis we usually expect from Hoppy.
 
So, you mean if the Falcons had scored more points, they would have won?

That's the kid of dynamite analysis we usually expect from Hoppy.

That's the type of reading comprehension I don't expect from people who are old enough to brew beer.

Put in simple terms for you the Falcons and the Saints had the same number of scoring drives. The difference is that the Saints foudn the endzone more. AKA finished drives.

Got it now?
 
so, what you're saying is, when the saints had the ball, they scored touchdowns. and when the falcons had the ball, they did not score touchdowns.

and that caused the falcons to lose the game?

hrm, football is hard sometimes.
 
so, what you're saying is, when the saints had the ball, they scored touchdowns. and when the falcons had the ball, they did not score touchdowns.

and that caused the falcons to lose the game?

hrm, football is hard sometimes.

Math, I know right.
 
That's the type of reading comprehension I don't expect from people who are old enough to brew beer.

Put in simple terms for you the Falcons and the Saints had the same number of scoring drives. The difference is that the Saints foudn the endzone more. AKA finished drives.

Got it now?

umm... yeah... I got it. Moto was able to clear up the confusion for me. At first I didn't get the whole "if the Falcons had scored more, they would have won" part but now I got it.

I'm emailing Belichick now.

"Dear Bill, I am a season ticket holder and while I have a tremendous amount of respect for your ability to run the team but... I just heard this idea on the interwebs that CAN NOT be beat. See... what you wanna do against the Broncos this weekend is... find the endzone... MORE than the Broncos. I know.. I know... it's craaaaaaaazy but I have a feeling this might work. When the Broncos are trying to find the endzone... don't let them!!! But then you SHOULD find the endzone. Combine those two strategies and I predict Manning Face."

I'll laying huge money on the Pats.
 
HOLY CRAP!!!!!!!!

It works for hockey too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Instead of using the word "endzone" though... just substitute it with "net"!!!

Mind.... BLOWN.
 
Back
Top