- Joined
- Sep 15, 2007
- Messages
- 3,290
- Reaction score
- 175
Falcons are one of the best home teams and the Patriots took it to them. Very nice win.
bluemoose said:Wait lemme guess, the falcons suck they're only 1-3. Wait till the Pats have to play a real team, Right?
Nice. You've caught up to my Seahawks.![]()
Well said... Another cream puff win
That was an unnecessarily entertaining fourth quarter, and the referees and replay officials should be investigated for malfeasance, but indeed, sück it, Patriot Haters!
Cheers!
[edit] ps: the window to beat the Patriots may be closing as Brady is definitely getting into these youngsters' heads...
h22lude said:The replay officials need to be fired. OK I get it, every game has bad calls but to deny a challenged play because equipment wasn't working is a totally different thing. No it didn't change the outcome of the game. The team that was winning still won but that doesn't matter to me. What matters is the officials thought it was ok to deny the challenged play and let the game continue. What if that changed the game? What if it was another Hawks/Packers situation? Terrible calling in my opinion.
1. It was a catch
2. Should they postpone the game for a day or two until they get working?
3. It was a catch
4. You should like a complete pvssy with that needless griping
h22lude said:1) I don't care 2) Yes they should delay the game until the equipment is working. I don't care that it was the Pats. This would apply to any game. If a challenge is thrown and the equipment isn't working they need to fix it. No way around it. A play was challenged so they need to review it. So now because equipment isn't working the refs can just take away parts of the game? Oh the cameras are down so we are just going to stop the game here and who ever is ahead wins. 3) Again I don't care. It was a challenge, they must review the play. 4) I do like a complete *****. I'm guessing you like an incomplete *****? Or maybe you don't like ***** at all!
Oh the cameras are down so we are just going to stop the game here and who ever is ahead wins.
one thing's for certain, billy would ensure his cameras are operational.
Matt Schaub is a complete POS as a player, what a joke, he's absolutely terrible.
Lolololol at that brilliant Chimp Kelly offense. 1-3 and looking like a hot steaming bag of doo doo.
Matt Schaub is a complete POS as a player, what a joke, he's absolutely terrible.
HoppyDaze said:no grown man should ever use 'lolz" there's no excuse for it.
bluemoose said:(gulp) agreed.
Just like a pats fan - always swallowing before agreeing with a seahawk fan.
Children, please. Broncos are where it's at! Even without avowed pot smoker Von Miller and old man Bailey.
Beating up on pretty **** teams right now, then again a lot of the AFC is ****.
Almost as bad as the NFC.
Sure.
AFC record to this point
36-28
NFC record to this point
27-35
NFC has 7 teams with only one win, AFC only has one team with one win. Each has 2 teams with zero wins
Any other questions?
AFC record to this point
36-28
NFC record to this point
27-35
NFC has 7 teams with only one win, AFC only has one team with one win. Each has 2 teams with zero wins
Any other questions?
NFC still has the better teams.
NFC still has the better teams.
What matters is who they are playing. If NFC teams are playing each other, that just means they are playing against better teams. Someone has to compile a breakdown of games played NFC vs AFC in order to see who plays better again the other.
What matters is who they are playing. If NFC teams are playing each other, that just means they are playing against better teams. Someone has to compile a breakdown of games played NFC vs AFC in order to see who plays better again the other.
What matters is who they are playing. If NFC teams are playing each other, that just means they are playing against better teams. Someone has to compile a breakdown of games played NFC vs AFC in order to see who plays better again the other.
Enter your email address to join: