You agree though; Indy would be completely ****tarded to bring back Peyton, right?
As I recall, there's something quirky with his contract. They can't trade him before the $28M is due. If they pay him and bring him back in 2012, there's something that would make cutting him at that point cap-problematic for 2013. Don't recall all the details.
EDIT: And, as much as it pains me to say.... Green Bay's good enough where them dropping a 49-bomber isn't necessarily an indictment of the defense.
As I recall, there's something quirky with his contract. They can't trade him before the $28M is due. If they pay him and bring him back in 2012, there's something that would make cutting him at that point cap-problematic for 2013. Don't recall all the details.
EDIT: And, as much as it pains me to say.... Green Bay's good enough where them dropping a 49-bomber isn't necessarily an indictment of the defense.