• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

No chill brewing is like going to Mexico

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Grinder12000

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
2,996
Reaction score
50
Location
Columbus WI
Every time I read any thing about no chill brewing the topic turns to chance of infection or is the taste off. This is like taking a vacation to Mexico and everyone asks if you got sick.

Why bother if there is ANY chance.
 
How will no chill get infected? Where do the off flavors come from? I would have to think that since the guys actually doing it are having great results, that they would know more than anyone sitting on the sideline.

The only people I hear really talking about off flavors and infections, are the people NOT doing it, funny how that works.
 
Ah, stupid me, I figured "no chill" is like going to mexico because all you have to do is relax and let things happen when the time comes. No need to be in such a damn hurry, less work and pitch the damn yeast when your ready. I say we stop using the term "no chill" as it's innaccurate as a chill is taking place...perhaps "sterile wort canning" or even "SWC", is more accurate, and less trashable.
 
I don't get why folks are bashing grinder for expressing what looks more like a rhetorical question then a bash of the process to me. He probably formed that based on glancing at a few problem/challenge threads about it.

I mean I haven't followed every no chill thread, but just glancing at some of the titles, like even THIS one from the similar threads box below, https://www.homebrewtalk.com/f13/no-chill-beer-chill-haze-ugh-127407/ could lead some to think maybe there is a problem.

We DO have new brewers on here who have come on and seen a ton of threads with titles like "Infection" and without reading the entire threads, where we experienced brewers have established that the noob who created the thread was looking at their first krausen and was just scared by the sheer ugliness of it, and have remarked that by looking at all the thread titles that infections or stuck fermentations run rampant (when even those stuck ferm threads are usually under 72 hours, going by airlock and not using hydrometer threads rather than real stuck ferm threads.)

I betcha grinder is coming from the same mindset, seeing thread titles, and maybe glancing at a few of the problem threads is thinking the same thing.....

Rather than bash him for it or call him a troll (which he's been around here long enough to be established as NOT a troll, just inquisitive, and a pretty decent guy,) why dontcha educate him instead. Point him to the successful threads rather than the worrisome ones.

My take on No CHill, and having been one of the first ones on here to post about how interesting it was, and to defend it when the typical "we bash what we are ignorant of, or that which goes against conventional wisdom" thing happened initially, is that it is going to pretty quick expose any holes in your sanitization regimen and brewing process...if you are sloppy in it, especially in your post boil sanitization regimen you could possibly have a problem, or at least you could have a greater risk of it, over quick cooling.

And more than likely those who try it and post problem threads, probably are new brewers who aren't quite established in their sanitization methodolgy and run into problem...

Or are simple starting the no chill equivelent of "is my beer ruined" threads because they THINK they are having problems when in reality they are just nervous about it.

And Grinder has just picked up on it....I don't think he's trying to bash it, or troll, I think he's interested in learning about it, and to a surface view it looks to him like there's a lot of problems with it.

I can't really see anything wrong with his initial post or his metaphor of mexico, there are ignorant folks out there, who equate Mexico with instant illness, especially in light of the swine flu panic, as well as the old stories of Montezuma's revenge. We know people visiting sometimes get sick down there, but that doesn't mean ALL people do.

Just like some beers DO get infected, but those are in the minority, despite what some new folks looking on may misperceive.
 
I have come to realize over the year or two of Grinder's presence on here, is that the statement on his sigline,
What I don't know I'll obsess over.

Really DOES fit him....So I'm thinking this is more of the same....he's stumbled upon No Chill, ljust like he had stumbled upon other new things in this hobby and is churning it over in that obsessive mind of his.

:D
 
I know Grinder isn't a troll, but the post came off as troll-ish to me. There are a lot of great threads where people have gone back and forth on various issues in "no chill" brewing ad nauseum. IMO, its gone way past the theory and even proof of concept. It works, and people don't get infections. Since you hot pack the wort in a cube, you are doing a great job of sanitizing.

If he didn't mean it as a troll post, or wasn't trying to stir up the pot, sorry, and I'll take down the pictures.
 
I know Grinder isn't a troll, but the post came off as troll-ish to me. There are a lot of great threads where people have gone back and forth on various issues in "no chill" brewing ad nauseum. IMO, its gone way past the theory and even proof of concept. It works, and people don't get infections. Since you hot pack the wort in a cube, you actually sterilize, not just sanitize.

If he didn't mean it as a troll post, or wasn't trying to stir up the pot, sorry, and I'll take down the pictures.

But there's also been enough superficial is my no-chill beer ruined?" titled threads, in which more than likely experienced no chill brewers have quelled the fire on it, that anyone looking on could think without reading the meat of the thread, otherwise.
 
Anyone interested in the outcomes of "no chill".... there are a few threads here on HBT where the users have discussed thier techniques and the beers, even posted photos of some of them...

https://www.homebrewtalk.com/f13/side-side-no-chill-results-137209/
https://www.homebrewtalk.com/f13/exploring-no-chill-brewing-117111/
https://www.homebrewtalk.com/f13/no...t-your-good-bad-notes-here-128684/index2.html
https://www.homebrewtalk.com/f13/no-chill-beer-chill-haze-ugh-127407/

These threads all discuss the successes of no chill brewing.

It does work, and quite well. Sanitation is not an issue, I dont know many people that place cooled wort into a heat sanitized fermentor. I mean, not much, if anything, will survive being locked in an air tight vessel at 200F+. Your wort goes into the fermentor too hot for anything to survive, and then stays that way in the fermentor for some time. It is much more sanitary than cooling wort in the open and then placing it in a sanitized fermentor.

Anyhow, great successes with no chill, no DMS, no off flavors, just really good beer without the need to cool it artificially. Some posters here have brewed Pilsners using this method and report great success.

Logically, it is much more sanitary than cooling wort and placing it in a cold fermentor and waiting up to 3 days to get an active fermentation in that vessel. Hop adjustments have been made, with great success I might add, by the knowlege gained from users on this board and elsewhere.

Whether it was trolling or not, I have no idea, as I dont know what the OP even meant. What I do know is that nearly every person I have heard talk about how "no chill" will create sub par beer, is also a person that has never tried it... but they have read plenty of books from the 70's and 80's. Funny, some of these same people batch sparge... wonder if they know when that became mainstream?
 
I just read about No Chill because I had seen the term around here a few times and I didn't know what it was. From what I understand, it is no more likely to get an infection than any other brew that was racked one more time (assuming you sanitized the storage canister). Correct? Also, I would think No Chill would help clarify the beer as well. If you transfered it out of your cooling canister into a fermenter off of whatever has settled to the bottom. Am I reaching far for this one?

I am not sure No Chill is for me at the moment, only because I am to impatient to let my brew sit around for 24 hours when I could be fermenting.
 
I just read about No Chill because I had seen the term around here a few times and I didn't know what it was. From what I understand, it is no more likely to get an infection than any other brew that was racked one more time (assuming you sanitized the storage canister). Correct? Also, I would think No Chill would help clarify the beer as well. If you transfered it out of your cooling canister into a fermenter off of whatever has settled to the bottom. Am I reaching far for this one?

I am not sure No Chill is for me at the moment, only because I am to impatient to let my brew sit around for 24 hours when I could be fermenting.

I let my no chill beers ferment with all of the break material in the fermentor. Break material being present, doenst mean cloudy beer. Or course this was a concern about not chilling wort, since most books from the 70s and 80s say that quick chilling and removal of break material equals better beer.

Here is my no chill SNPA clone.
NOCHILLSNPA.JPG


Best way to see if it works, is to do it... because it flies in the face of so much conventional wisdom, people are always going to have a problem with it and denounce it, without trying it.
 
Has anyone seen a Brewing Network or Basic Brewing podcast about no chill? I'm talking about hosting a no-chill brewer and doing a full show about it. You'd think that with all of the people taking it up lately, and all of the positive aspects about it, one of those guys would look into it and bring this info to the forefront.

It could certainly be helpful to those who live where water is scarce and/or too warm for a chiller to be effective.
 
This is certainly an interesting topic but I believe the OP is a complete moron troll and if I ever get my hands on him . . . . . .

I believe it was a "brew enhanced topic" and I actually think the topic should now be classified under the glass vs. better bottle, primary vs. secondary topics.

Sort of like - you can do both so . . . let's move on.

The REAL question is - so what other things can we debunk about common brewing situations.

All I know is I'm going to no chill my brew under our Maple Tree in the fall!
 
Much can probably be debunked, but like most things, there is a hardcore group that will refuse to accept it is a viable option.

We need some new HBing books, already all of the books that I own are obsolete... sorry Charles.
 
We need some new HBing books, already all of the books that I own are obsolete... sorry Charles.

I agree. I vote Kaiser to be the author.

I deleted my first post. It just seemed that the way the question was stated, Grinder was trying to stir up the pot.
 
Back
Top