What do you guys think about limiting number of entries to 3?
Maybe a higher limit for AHA members to encourage membership?
Maybe a higher limit for AHA members to encourage membership?
What do you guys think about limiting number of entries to 3?
Maybe a higher limit for AHA members to encourage membership?
Some of that is mitigated by the first and second round judging - getting a beer to the second round is quite difficult in itself. You need to factor in the judges, how that beer has held up - many factors. But also, he did factor that in by stating out of a minimum number of entries:
They already provide the $5 discount to AHA members. So if you were going to submit more than 5 entries the discount almost makes the AHA membership pay for itself. I'd be surprised if more then 10% of the entries were from non-AHA members.
They probably should do a limit, at something higher like 8 though. Or 1 entry per category, not sub-category.
Speaking of these rules. Can I enter a beer as head brewer in the 21a category and also be an additional brewer for a beer submitted in the same category?
You know, if you're a bad ass who can manage to brew/make 100 different styles, that are national level quality, and you spend the $1000 to enter them all, and the judges blindly pick a majority of them as excellent beers, what's the problem again? Oh, it makes everyone exceedingly jealous.
Enter your email address to join: