Starrider
Well-Known Member
FDA stamp or not, what is important IMO are the materials used. All the FDA stamp means is that someone paid a bunch of money to have something inspected and approved by them.
If you can afford $500+ brew pots and quadruple digit brew systems, more power to you. Not all of us can afford that and look for cheaper alternatives. I would not promote anything that is unsafe, just because the FDA hasn't put their stamp on something, doesn't by default make it unsafe. I'll bet the cooler that everyone uses as a mash tun wasn't approved. How do you know the plastic is safe for hot wort? Many plastics gas at high temperatures. That's why we have CPVC.
Now on the positive side; I found out this is 100% aluminum and uses aluminum solder in a reflow furnace that would also burn off any flux residues. An alcohol bath would take off everything else. As a new unit, no glycol or others were ever introduced.
To me, this is holding up as a viable option
If you can afford $500+ brew pots and quadruple digit brew systems, more power to you. Not all of us can afford that and look for cheaper alternatives. I would not promote anything that is unsafe, just because the FDA hasn't put their stamp on something, doesn't by default make it unsafe. I'll bet the cooler that everyone uses as a mash tun wasn't approved. How do you know the plastic is safe for hot wort? Many plastics gas at high temperatures. That's why we have CPVC.
Now on the positive side; I found out this is 100% aluminum and uses aluminum solder in a reflow furnace that would also burn off any flux residues. An alcohol bath would take off everything else. As a new unit, no glycol or others were ever introduced.
To me, this is holding up as a viable option