Yes, to all of the above, in this thread or another. And yes I still have my empty sachets and will contact Danstar.
Interesting. Your posting history certainly shows no signs of having done so. I'm talking pitch temp, ferment temp, original gravity, aeration yes/no, nutrient yes/no, rehydration yes/no, place of purchase, and so forth, not "omg 72 hour start notty suxxx". I do hope you contact Danstar and give them good information.
Look. I'm not trying to insult people here. I'm not trying to tell people who are having trouble that they are imagining things. I'm not trying to say that if there is something wrong with your beer then it must be your fault.
If you have a bad sachel and you contact the manufacturer, you're halfway there. However, if all you do is tell them that you have a bad batch and you blame their yeast,
they will discard your complaint because they will assume you did something wrong to kill their yeast. A complete rundown on your process and the variables of your unique system are important if for no other reason than it helps convince the rightfully skeptical that there is something wrong going on.
Once again, if you have a truely bad batch and all you're doing is b!tching in these threads and not contacting the manufacturer with a complete rundown on your brewing process and the yeast symptoms in your batch, then you're just spinning your wheels (and scaring new brewers in the process).
(this is for dwarven)
Yes, thank you, I now understand no problem has ever existed with notty, the moon walk was staged, the CIA killed JFK, and the government blew up the twin towers, because I can't prove otherwise.
This is just being dense. If you can't see the value of backing up anecdotal claims with some sort of actual qualitative and quantitative documentation, then I frankly think you deserve yeast that is quality-checked by anecdote.