Need some new post buttons.

[The_Bishop]

It's awesome how we can 'like' posts.

We also need a thumbs down button.

Maybe a "Read the f*****g OP's post" button.

A "This post is bad and you should feel bad" button would be cool, while we're at it.

Last one, "It's obvious you don't know jack s**t, why did you post" button?

 

[noggins]

 

[Pappers_]

 

[day_trippr]

I'm constantly rating sh!tty threads with a single star.
I'm pretty sure nobody has noticed...

Cheers! ; )

 

[betarhoalphadelta]

There should be an automated "let me Google that for you" button too

 

[harleybug88]

There should also be a "can't we all just get along" button.

 

[joshesmusica]

I agree with all of the above, and likely most of what's to follow.

 

[Homercidal]

I vote for a vomit icon.

 

[hunter_le five]

I vote for a vomit icon.

Vomiticon? Vomicon?

I've heard rumors that if you whine and beg and plead and threaten enough, sometimes the admins will take pity on you and add new icons for you. Though that may only apply to goat-related icons....

 

[DrunkleJon]

What do you want HBT to become? Reddit?

Upvotes, downvotes, etc. Are we going to start getting flair and reputation points?

 

[Tin4]

It's awesome how we can 'like' posts.

We also need a thumbs down button.

Maybe a "Read the f*****g OP's post" button.

A "This post is bad and you should feel bad" button would be cool, while we're at it.

Last one, "It's obvious you don't know jack s**t, why did you post" button?

I've been asked before, and I prefer to keep things positive. If it's not a good thread it will die.

 

[Homercidal]

I've been asked before, and I prefer to keep things positive. If it's not a good thread it will die.

I don't understand this. We're all just like family here!

Nobody would ever think about disparaging another person on this site, even in cute little animated icons!

 

[Homercidal]

 

[Psylocide]

I've been asked before, and I prefer to keep things positive. If it's not a good thread it will die.

No it won't.

It'll go on for 50 pages until the goats come, then it'll go 23 pages more until a grammar argument ensues for approx. 12.3 pages, and then I'm not quite sure what happens.

Probably more goats though.

 

[hunter_le five]

 

[noggins]

 

[The_Bishop]

I was only quasi-serious.

I blame an unlucky streak of threads that met all of those criteria, in conjunction with a lack of sleep.

 

[Psylocide]

I was only quasi-serious.

I blame an unlucky streak of threads that met all of those criteria, in conjunction with a lack of sheep.

ftfy.

See how this works guys?

 

[noggins]

 

[The_Bishop]

I've been watching for an hour, when's it going to swallow?!

 

[The_Bishop]

Maybe I should just have a macro for this:

 

[mattd2]

No it won't.

It'll go on for 50 pages until the goats come, then it'll go 23 pages more until a grammar argument ensues for approx. 12.3 pages, and then I'm not quite sure what happens.

Probably more goats though.

Economics... I'm pretty sure it was economics next...

 

[Rhumbline]

No it won't.

It'll go on for 50 pages until the goats come, then it'll go 23 pages more until a grammar argument ensues for approx. 12.3 pages, and then I'm not quite sure what happens.

Probably more goats though.

Nah, it lies dormant for a while and then someone with a lot of time on their hands notices it and starts the cycle all over.