My RO water has a very low pH due to dissolved CO2 gas in the source water. This results in excess H+ ions, which lower pH, and there is no buffer in the RO to absorb the H+ ions. Below is my attempt at trying to understand the process and what may be causing the trouble of brewing with this kind of RO water. Any input is greatly appreciated!
Please correct me where I'm wrong:
So the pH of water is determined by the presence of H+ and OH- ions, which contrubite to acidic and basic pH, respectively. The alkalinity refers to the buffering capacity, which is the capacity to "absorb" H+ and OH- ions that are introduced, and therefore protect against pH swings. This is related to why Bru'n Water has you add acid to reduce the alkalinity of your sparge water, right, because the acid "uses up" the alkalinity buffer that's in your sparge water and also gets its pH lower?
Grains, especially darker ones, must somehow add H+ ions to your mash liquor, which is why the pH drops during the mash. However, if that drop isn't enough, then we add some acid to the mash water as well, to get the drop into the desired range. RO water doesn't tend to have much alkalinity, so this needs to be taken into account in the calculations. For instance, when I conducted a little water experiment and compared two water profile creations from tap and RO--using Bru'n Water--it had me add acid for the tap batch, but not for the RO batch (typical IPA grain bill and water profile). Would this be because the RO batch had less alkalinity (i.e., buffer) to begin with, so the pH was more easily swayed to the desired level?
So what then is the net effect when there's an additional variable in the mix, such as lots of dissolved CO2 gas in the RO water? It doesn't have much buffering capacity to begin with, and the CO2 reacts with molecules to produce an excess of H+ ions, which results in crazy low pH to begin with (this part, at least, is fact and not conjecture). So then salt additions and possibly acid additions are introduced, as well as the grains, all of which would tend to lower pH, presumably through some kind of contribution of H+ ions through some reactions? If the water profile, resulting from the salt additions, doesn't end up with enough alkalinity (or hardness, as Bru'n Water calculates?), can this result in overshooting the predicted drop in pH?
Btw, I've noticed that Bru'n Water asks for pH and alkalinity of source water on the source worksheet, UNLESS you're using purely RO water, which is then just entered into the water adjustment worksheet with the estimated properties of RO water (i.e., near pure). Therefore, it seems Bru'n Water isn't accounting for differences in RO water, such as high amounts of dissolved CO2, which then produces H+ ions, which will then eventually "use up" some of (a lot of?) the buffering capacity that is added through the salt additions?
I hope that makes sense, and that someone can help me and others understand the process a bit better.
Thanks in advance!
Please correct me where I'm wrong:
So the pH of water is determined by the presence of H+ and OH- ions, which contrubite to acidic and basic pH, respectively. The alkalinity refers to the buffering capacity, which is the capacity to "absorb" H+ and OH- ions that are introduced, and therefore protect against pH swings. This is related to why Bru'n Water has you add acid to reduce the alkalinity of your sparge water, right, because the acid "uses up" the alkalinity buffer that's in your sparge water and also gets its pH lower?
Grains, especially darker ones, must somehow add H+ ions to your mash liquor, which is why the pH drops during the mash. However, if that drop isn't enough, then we add some acid to the mash water as well, to get the drop into the desired range. RO water doesn't tend to have much alkalinity, so this needs to be taken into account in the calculations. For instance, when I conducted a little water experiment and compared two water profile creations from tap and RO--using Bru'n Water--it had me add acid for the tap batch, but not for the RO batch (typical IPA grain bill and water profile). Would this be because the RO batch had less alkalinity (i.e., buffer) to begin with, so the pH was more easily swayed to the desired level?
So what then is the net effect when there's an additional variable in the mix, such as lots of dissolved CO2 gas in the RO water? It doesn't have much buffering capacity to begin with, and the CO2 reacts with molecules to produce an excess of H+ ions, which results in crazy low pH to begin with (this part, at least, is fact and not conjecture). So then salt additions and possibly acid additions are introduced, as well as the grains, all of which would tend to lower pH, presumably through some kind of contribution of H+ ions through some reactions? If the water profile, resulting from the salt additions, doesn't end up with enough alkalinity (or hardness, as Bru'n Water calculates?), can this result in overshooting the predicted drop in pH?
Btw, I've noticed that Bru'n Water asks for pH and alkalinity of source water on the source worksheet, UNLESS you're using purely RO water, which is then just entered into the water adjustment worksheet with the estimated properties of RO water (i.e., near pure). Therefore, it seems Bru'n Water isn't accounting for differences in RO water, such as high amounts of dissolved CO2, which then produces H+ ions, which will then eventually "use up" some of (a lot of?) the buffering capacity that is added through the salt additions?
I hope that makes sense, and that someone can help me and others understand the process a bit better.
Thanks in advance!