Lactobacillus Brevis

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

mcnewcp

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
150
Reaction score
2
Location
Nashville
Hey guys,

Does anybody know where I can get ahold of some lactobacillus brevis? I'd like to use it to make a Berliner Weiss, instead of the more common delbrueckii.

Thanks
 
I don't know if Lactobacillus Buchneri would do the trick but more beer sells it. They say it is used in Berliner Weisse and always used in conjunction with S.cerevisiae and often with various wild yeast.
 
ATCC #367, but I've only ordered using the address of an academic lab. L. fructivorans might be interesting, too.

I was hoping for a smaller scale and lower price range than that.

The main reason I didn't want to go with delbrueckii is because I had heard it is slower acting than brevis and because it is homofermentative and therefore won't produce alcohol. Does anyone have experience with delbrueckii? Also, does anyone know which strain/strains are in WLP677?
 
There's a patent on "yoghurt beer" from 1910 on making beer with subsp . Bulgaricus (Kaiserliches Patentamt Patentschrift No. 245607), so it probably works just fine.

I've been trying to get hold of some L. brevis too, since Prof. Methner has identified this as the most important Lactobacillus in Berliner Weiße. Unfortunately, they are not so easy to come by.

Fortunately, the taste difference between different strains of Lactobacillus is said to be not too big. I'm having quite good success using L. delbrueckii (if you give them a starter and some time to start souring before adding the yeast, they sure are slow).

One funny thing: there is a specific gene sequence in L. brevis that is responsible for hop resistance. It is not present in all strains of L. brevis, though. Would be worth the effort to find a hop-resistant L. brevis, and make a hopped Berliner Weiße...

Edit: WLP677 contains the wrong yeast! "Traditional German Weizen yeast" is actually a specific strain that produces a couple of aromas (clover, banana) typical for southern German Weizen. Berliner Weiße is made using regular top-fermenting yeast, which was also used for making bitters and brown beers. I have some good experience with Wyeast 1007, although I figure there is some comparable WLP yeast. Don't forget the Brett, too. Most styleguides won't tell you, but chemical analysis of historical Berliner Weiße shows that Brett is important.

Oh, and don't boil your Berliner Weiße for more than 5 minutes, or not at all, if you dare. That's something Wyeast got completely wrong on their recipe page.
 
Supposedly cascade brewing in Oregon only uses a strain of lacto to sour their beers. Next time I get my hands on a bottle I'll have to see if I can culture some. I've got some HLP Medium to try.
 
Edit: WLP677 contains the wrong yeast! "Traditional German Weizen yeast" is actually a specific strain that produces a couple of aromas (clover, banana) typical for southern German Weizen. Berliner Weiße is made using regular top-fermenting yeast, which was also used for making bitters and brown beers. I have some good experience with Wyeast 1007, although I figure there is some comparable WLP yeast. Don't forget the Brett, too. Most styleguides won't tell you, but chemical analysis of historical Berliner Weiße shows that Brett is important.

I think you mean the berliner weisse blend WLP630. I noticed that too and I was planning on using a lacto starter with a neutral european strain pitched a day or two later, like WLP011. The WLP677 is just lacto, however there is no mention to the specific strain.

Oh, and don't boil your Berliner Weiße for more than 5 minutes, or not at all, if you dare. That's something Wyeast got completely wrong on their recipe page.

I was planning on doing a 10 or 15 minute boil, much like in Jamil's Brewing Classic Styles. I will be careful to keep the IBUs below 5, though.
 
I think you mean the berliner weisse blend WLP630.

Oops, you're right!

The WLP677 is just lacto, however there is no mention to the specific strain.

I recall reading that this is L. delbrueckii too, but I've lost the reference.

I recommend checking the pH while waiting for the wort to sour. Pitch yeast if it drops below 4. One or two days is a good estimate, but I had cases where it took three, and then your Weiße wouldn't be sour enough.

Do you plan to add Brett for secondary? i wholeheartedly recommend it. I had a bottle of Groterjan Berliner Weiße back from the 70s recently, and the Brett is a huge part of the taste profile.

I was planning on doing a 10 or 15 minute boil, much like in Jamil's Brewing Classic Styles. I will be careful to keep the IBUs below 5, though.

The longer you boil, the slower the lactos become. Traditionally, a turbid mashing scheme is used (pretty much a decoction, but boiling the liquid portion of the mash only), and the hops are boiled with the decocted part of the thin mash. The whole wort isn't boiled at all.

I do a single-step infusion mash, boil for five minutes, and completely skip the hops. Works just fine.
 
Do you plan to add Brett for secondary? i wholeheartedly recommend it.

I wasn't originally planning on it, but you're not the first to recommend it, so now I'm definitely considering. My previous experience with brett suggested that brett character can develop rather quickly, much quicker than lacto, so what would you say to adding brett at bottling?

I do a single-step infusion mash, boil for five minutes, and completely skip the hops. Works just fine.

I think I'll adopt your 5 minute boil idea, though the lack of any hops concerns me.
 
My previous experience with brett suggested that brett character can develop rather quickly, much quicker than lacto, so what would you say to adding brett at bottling?

That depends on how much Brett character you want. It's not too much to pitch it right with the main yeast, but if you want to be a bit more subtle, go for pitching at bottling time. Original Berliner Weiße used to vary in Brett aroma strength, but when the first tests using single-cell yeast cultures were done, the absence of Brett was invariably detected by the tasters.

Prof. Methner did an analysis of the pitching yeast used by Schultheiß in the 80s, and found it to contain lactos, regular yeast *and* Brett, all living in happy symbiosis.

I think I'll adopt your 5 minute boil idea, though the lack of any hops concerns me.

10 would still be ok, I think, but 15 is bordering on too much. You could add the hops by boiling them separately with a bit of water, if you worry about hop utilization.
 
I'd be willing to give the cheese packets a try. just pitch with a strain of Sacc and Brett then see what happens.
 
If ATCC is too expensive, you might try to write to the Faculté d'OEnologie de Bordeaux. I've never dealt with them, but I know that they have scores of Lactobacillus strains banked. As you live in Nashville, you might also consider writing to someone in the microbiology department of Vanderbilt.

L. brevis is one of the species in sauerkraut. You could always make some sauerkraut (good timing as cabbage is in season) and recover some supernatant and scale up cultures from there. Of course, you'd also have a host of other Lactobacillus species, and you'd likely have to to do it before the kraut fully acidifies.
 
No, the main species in sauerkraut is Leuconostoc mesenteroides, not L. brevis. And using that to ferment beer produces awful results - I have tried.

Another possible source of L. brevis is sourdough, though.
 
I added the dregs of a Cascade Kriek bottle (probably the most sour beer I've ever had) to a small starter yesterday. I'll report back if it works.
 
As you live in Nashville, you might also consider writing to someone in the microbiology department of Vanderbilt.

As a current engineering grad student at Vandy, I've already been working on this one, haha.

What about isolating L. brevis out of a waterkefir culture?

What else could I expect to find in waterkefir?
 
You might want to try contacting Al from East Coast Yeast. I believe he has multiple strains of lactobacillus that he includes in his blends
 
No, the main species in sauerkraut is Leuconostoc mesenteroides, not L. brevis. And using that to ferment beer produces awful results - I have tried.

Another possible source of L. brevis is sourdough, though.

Yeah, there appears to be some controversy. The reference I gave (and a few other secondary references) says it's one of the dominant species, but this more recent and probably more technically proficient study (also see here), claims L. mesenteroides is initially the dominant species with a change over to L. plantarum as fermentation proceeds. I've used sauerkraut innoculant to sour a beer a couple of times, and I actually got a pretty clean souring. My only issue was it eventually became too sour for my taste, and I ended up using the beer for blending.
 
What else could I expect to find in waterkefir?
Well, there seemed to be a lot of different strains involved like Saccharomyces, Lactobacillus, Kloeckera, Candida, Pediococcus...Go to Wikipedia. But one of them is L. brevis which is needed for the formation of the grain layers. I'll think about a strategy how to isolate the L. brevis out of the grains.
 
I'll think about a strategy how to isolate the L. brevis out of the grains.

Let me know what you come up with.

For now, I think I'll go with L. delbrueckii initially, followed by WLP011 and brett C after the wort drops below pH 4. If anyone finds a cheaper source for L. brevis let me know please.
 
I asked Al at ECY if he had other strains of Lacto and he said no, but pointed out that Wyeast's Lacto is subsp. buchneri. Somehow I've always overlooked that fact or they didn't publicize it till recently.

I can only get White Labs at my LHBS, so I'll have to special order Wyeast 5335 to try it out. Has anyone made a Berliner and tried the Wyeast and White Labs lacto in different fermenters?

If anyone has a fresh bottle of any Cascade beer, Al said he would try to isolate a culture from it. Next time I get one I'll send some over to him, but I can only get it when I drive over to Portland
 
If there's any chance of reviving lactos from a 30 year old bottle of original Berliner Weiße, I might have a donation to make. Could you put me into contact with Al?
 
I asked Al at ECY if he had other strains of Lacto and he said no, but pointed out that Wyeast's Lacto is subsp. buchneri. Somehow I've always overlooked that fact or they didn't publicize it till recently.

I just picked up a pack of the 5335 today for use in this berliner weisse. If I remember correctly, the buchneri is heterofermentative, meaning it actually produces alcohol, unlike the delbrueckii. Correct me if I'm wrong.

If anyone comes up with an interesting strain of lacto I'd love to try it.

Seconded.
 
I just picked up a pack of the 5335 today for use in this berliner weisse. If I remember correctly, the buchneri is heterofermentative, meaning it actually produces alcohol, unlike the delbrueckii. Correct me if I'm wrong.

You are correct
 
Has anyone made a Berliner and tried the Wyeast and White Labs lacto in different fermenters?

I did this recently using White Labs lacto in 5 gals and a separate 5 gals using a wild lacto culture made from a cup of raw grain in 2 cups of 100F water for a week.

Interestingly, they both looked very different during fermentation, the wild got tart much faster. But now that they are bottled and conditioned, they taste identical...no difference at all. BTW both are very tart.

Here is a photo after 18 hours... https://www.homebrewtalk.com/f127/pellicle-photo-collection-174033/index31.html
 

Latest posts

Back
Top