howabouttheiris
Well-Known Member
Just bought a 24 of Stone IPA at the Costco.
There is good commercial beer.
There is good commercial beer.
Truly, even a style can be a limiting factor. It's only useful for competition purposes. You can make a VERY tasty beer that does not fit any style confines. You should not subtract "points" for it outside of a competition.
Does it taste good? There ya go.
They probably have someone else buy cases of PBR for them.
I'll admit I can be a bit of a snob sometimes, but try to keep an open mind. I've actually grown tired of the Beer Advocate reviews. If a beer isn't overly (insert favorite flavor note here), then it won't get a good rating. Forget any kind of good rating for a std lager. There is just a little bit too much of comparing apples and oranges. Yes this pilsner has nowhere near the hops of an IPA, but that doesn't mean the pilsner can't be just as good. I wish the people would judge them to style. Instead, is seems more like the styles themselves are rated. "Oh, it's a pilsner, well then subtract X points right there."
Just bought a 24 of Stone IPA at the Costco.
There is good commercial beer.
They probably have someone else buy cases of PBR for them.
I'll admit I can be a bit of a snob sometimes, but try to keep an open mind. I've actually grown tired of the Beer Advocate reviews. If a beer isn't overly (insert favorite flavor note here), then it won't get a good rating. Forget any kind of good rating for a std lager. There is just a little bit too much of comparing apples and oranges. Yes this pilsner has nowhere near the hops of an IPA, but that doesn't mean the pilsner can't be just as good. I wish the people would judge them to style. Instead, is seems more like the styles themselves are rated. "Oh, it's a pilsner, well then subtract X points right there."