Revvy said:Hey anyone notice the OP just "hit an git" and hasn't been back since his rant?
when you see these big beer company ads on TV talking about "triple hops brewed, vortex bottle, never watered down...bull**** bull**** bull****" ughh every time I see one now days it just makes me angry!
I was drunk and watching ultimate fighter last night and kept seeing all the beer comercials so i threw up a quick rant, so its best not to take me too seriously. but let me be more specific, it's the fact that america has been TRICKED into thinking that this is what beer should be. TRICKED by ad men into thinking that these three companies are the best of the best, and this is the gold standard. If prohibition hadn't happened and given AB the chance to get a tremendous leg up in the industry, imagine what the beer scene would look likwe today. Imagine the amount of breweries we would have locally and not paying to drink absolute ****, that no one claims tastes good (except the ads), its just "not bad", "easy to drink", "better than the other nasty yellow stuff". I'm sorry but I don't think it's ok for a company to come in and rape an industry the way that these big three have. But thats just my opinion.
Marketing has made many people want to smoke (remember the Malboro Man, who died of lung cancer?), drink, eat junk food, and buy cell phones. But we are all born with brains and should be able to figure that out.
And just think of what the beer scene would be like if AB hadn't survived prohibition. I doubt there would be much of one, if any at all.
You think AB had to survive in order for beer to survive? Really?
To a point. Would you rather find out what would have happened if they had gone under? I wouldn't. And don't try to say that we would have had the same kind of craft beer Renaissance that we do now, but earlier if AB had closed its doors. Breweries that opened after prohibition was repealed just about all put out "yellow piss swill" or whatever the super-refined crowd on here likes to call it. It's what Americans wanted then, it's what they want now, and it's what they'll want in the future.
Whatever, I'm done with this thread. It seems for every person out there that will never turn their face away from say, Coors Light, and thinks everything else is inferior, we have one on here that thinks they're far superior to anyone who drinks an American light lager. Which one's worse? Couldn't tell you.
cheezydemon3 said:AB selling DME during the dark years does not make them saints.
I say we kill anyone that drinks miller, budweiser, or Coors.....and Phenry.
AB selling DME during the dark years does not make them saints.
I say we kill anyone that drinks miller, budweiser, or Coors.....and Phenry.
Agree with me or not, let me ask you this:
What would the beer scene look like if everyone just accepted what was given to them and never questioned if there could be something better? I think having conversations like this is important, wether we agree or not. So although sometimes the discussion can get a little heated, i'm not sorry for asking the question.cheers
But realistically it's not a bad idea, it's really no difference than the Sam Adam's glass with the rough bottom to provide nucleation sites to help kick up the co2 which in turn lifts the flavors and aroma to our nose and certain taste buds. No different that using the "proper" glasswear for the style of beer.
People get pissed off because BMC did it, but in reality it's a principle that few true beer/wine enthusiast would argue that it doesn't had merit.
The other point about the bottle is that it ALSO promotes what we beer geeks know is the proper way to drink a beer....from a glass.
If we paid 700+ dollars and pulled a vortex bottle out of a stuffed squirrel from Brew Dog first, we'd be raving about the vortex bottle as a revolution in beer appreciation, or if it came from Dogfish Head, we'd want to suck Sam Caligione's weenus for his brilliance, but because it came from a macro brewery beer snobs look at it with disdain.....Instead of the fact that it does have some merit.
Same with Triple hopped...You know most other light american lagers, and many low IBU German style beers have only ONE hop addition? My Vienna Lager only has one, for bittering. So, Miller decided to do 3 additions like many ales, and it actually does have a bit more hop aroma/flavor. So they decided to promote the fact that it's different from BUD...What's the big deal?
And how different really is it with us creaming our jeans over 30, 60 and 120 minute IPA? It's ok because it's a Micro brewery?
At least in their own way they are teaching the american populace a tiny bit more about hops then they would have known. It might even encourage some folks to try hoppier styles of craft beer.
BMC doesn't necessarily make the best beer out there. That is all a matter of personal opinion. What they do is make the most difficult style out there. So many homebrewers make a batch or two of brown ale and suddenly BMC is swill and only the most uninformed rednecks would like it. It is not swill. It is a style that you suddenly don't care for and most of the reason you don't care for it is that they are huge, and for some reason homebrewers like to think that the bigger a corporation, the worse their product is and everyone that likes it is an idiot. Fact is, they make the most difficult style out there and do it on a massive scale and reach a consistency in their product that homebrewers can only dream of. Get off of your high-horses, people. Let BMC be BMC and enjoy your hobby.
Very true. And if you use Axe products, you will have scores of gorgeous women having orgasms at the very sight of you. How come no one gets upset about that? It is just advertising.
Agree with me or not, let me ask you this:
What would the beer scene look like if everyone just accepted what was given to them and never questioned if there could be something better? I think having conversations like this is important, wether we agree or not. So although sometimes the discussion can get a little heated, i'm not sorry for asking the question.cheers
I've thought BMC was swill since long before I could actually make anything myself. I understand that it's hard to make, and I understand why someone would want to drink it if they wanted alcohol and didn't actually like beer (the applies mostly to Bud Lite and Coors Light. I don't know anyone who actually drinks regular Bud or regular Coors). But that doesn't mean it's good.
It doesn't mean it is NOT good, either. It just means you don't care for it. That's ok. No one says you have to drink it. Just don't be rude or condescending about it. Gawd, I hate snobbery of any kind.
It doesn't mean it is NOT good, either. It just means you don't care for it. That's ok. No one says you have to drink it. Just don't be rude or condescending about it. Gawd, I hate snobbery of any kind.
I can listen to Mozart and understand what's good about his music, but I just don't like it that much. I prefer Beethoven or Chopin.
What? Mozart is the SHIZZZ!![]()