• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

General Mead Making Questions

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Delaney

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
486
Reaction score
22
Location
Montreal
1. After FG has been reached, does yeast continue to change the composition of the mead?

2. Other than consistency, and clarity, what advantage does bulk aging have over bottle aging?

3. Once fermentation is complete, would cold crashing the mead be an acceptable means of reducing the required length of bulk aging, provided that it would be clear sooner?

4. Other than presentation, would yeast sediment in the bottle aging of mead negatively affect the quality of the beverage?

5. In brewing, oxidation is avoided once the yeast begin to metabolize the sugar. Why is oxidation not an issue in mead production?

6. When I shake the mead to add oxygen during fermentation, should the airlock be removed for the introduction of new air, and expulsion of CO2? Or should CO2 be retained in the carboy such as it would be in brewing?
 
I can answer a few from what I've read, but am by no means qualified.

1. After FG has been reached, does yeast continue to change the composition of the mead?
If its left on the lee's then it can effect the taste. If fermentables are gone or they've reached their max tolerance and are so intoxicated that they can't do anything, I'd imagine no.

2. Other than consistency, and clarity, what advantage does bulk aging have over bottle aging?
Bulk aging keeps it consistent, because the larger amount of liquid is less susceptible to temp change.


5. In brewing, oxidation is avoided once the yeast begin to metabolize the sugar. Why is oxidation not an issue in mead production?
Seems like most people stop shaking the mead after the 1/3rd sugar break. And while bottling or racking they try and keep it from splashing and introducing oxygen.

6. When I shake the mead to add oxygen during fermentation, should the airlock be removed for the introduction of new air, and expulsion of CO2? Or should CO2 be retained in the carboy such as it would be in brewing?
Personally I didn't, I did more "swirls" than hard shaking. And most of my shaking was just to mix the honey in then swirled it for a few days.

Hopefully this gets you started, while somebody with more experience can jump in and give a better experienced answer.
 
are you talking about oxygenation or degassing? You still need to oxygenate when you pitch so the yeast can reproduce; but you should also be degassing for the first few days of active fermentation as well (you could leave the airlock on for this). This also serves to resuspend some of the lazier yeast. For reasons I don't know, mead is resistant to oxidation. Doesn't mean that it can't happen, but especially during co2 production you don't need to fear exposing it to air and shaking things up.

I would not think about bottling until it's both clear as well as there being a marked reduction of rocket fuel flavor. Some meads require a year or more to sufficiently age. Cold crashing may help to clear, as well as adding finings, but there is absolutely no substitute for good aging/racking procedures. Sediment in the bottle can be dangerous if one were to bottle before fermentation was truly complete. You would likely pick up some yeast in your glass, which I don't think is desirable for mead, but not the end of the world. Bottom line is try to rack at least 1-2 times, and age as long as you can stand to. A 2 month old mead may be acceptable, where the same mead 10 months later may be exquisite- what would you prefer?

Hope this helps you out!
 
1. After FG has been reached, does yeast continue to change the composition of the mead?
Not sure what you're alluding too here. The composition changes slowly over time, whether it's on the yeast or not. There's the possible spectre of "autolysis" when batches are left on the lees for too long - yet most yeasts don't seem to have this issue, though one that is known for this is 71B. Other yeasts will add different aspects to the flavour. Some desirable, some not so.
2. Other than consistency, and clarity, what advantage does bulk aging have over bottle aging?
Bulk ageing is the home brewers compromise. Professional wine makers tend to age in the bottle, but they also usually have access to large, temperature/climate controlled storage of some sort. The bulk ageing helps home brewers avoid inconsistency through some bottles getting climactically warmed more than others in a given storage location, plus it means you don't have to mess about trying to clear small quantities, it's just one big racking....
3. Once fermentation is complete, would cold crashing the mead be an acceptable means of reducing the required length of bulk aging, provided that it would be clear sooner?
ageing and clearing are two distinctly different processes. Cold crashing just seems to assist in helping to clear down the sediment quicker. It's also a handy technique if you've made a batch with a high gravity start and want to stop at a certain point. You'd cold crash for a week or two, then while it's still cool, rack off the lees onto stabilising chems (sulphite and sorbate) and usually, that's enough to have stopped the fermentation.

Even if you used finings, it's likely that you'd have to age for a certain amount of time. The fact it's cleared is less relevant to the ageing. In fact it's possible that you could get a flavour modification with any amount of lees left in the batch while ageing. Just that leaving it to clear over time is more cost effective.
4. Other than presentation, would yeast sediment in the bottle aging of mead negatively affect the quality of the beverage?
Yes. Any residual sediment in the bottle, will if disturbed, cause a "yeasty" flavour. Some people don't mind that, but some dislike it completely. So it's up to you as the mead maker to decide whether you want it like that or not. Also, if you're making sparkling meads, you either have to have some way of removing any sediment caused by the bottle priming (methode Champenoise) or a keg type system where you can force carbonate, then chill it down low to keep as much as the dissolved CO2 as possible while bottling.
5. In brewing, oxidation is avoided once the yeast begin to metabolize the sugar. Why is oxidation not an issue in mead production?
The effects of O2 exposure differ, depending on the recipe/ingredients. There are many more elements in a beer that are sensitive to oxygen exposure once the ferment is underway. Like the beer makers seeming to be more "anal" about oxidation and hygiene. It's more to do with beers being lower alcohol, as well as the malt and other ingredients being sensitive both to oxidation but also more sensitive to airbourne nasties. The higher levels of alcohol in wines make then less sensitive, but not proof against any possible spoilage organisms. It seems that the anti-bacterial/anti-fungal abilities of the honey, have some increased protection against spoilage that are passed on to the mead. Though I'd have thought any batches made with fruit or other materials that do oxidise easily will likely have a reduced protection, other than the alcohol level.

Generally wines and spirits, purely by virtue of the alcohol content, tend to have a long shelf life, but that's not guarantee that nothing nasty can't/won't get in.
6. When I shake the mead to add oxygen during fermentation, should the airlock be removed for the introduction of new air, and expulsion of CO2? Or should CO2 be retained in the carboy such as it would be in brewing?
Oxygen/Air exposure during the early part of the ferment need to come from somewhere. Yes, it's fair to point out that the release of dissolved CO2/carbonic acid is a side effect of the agitation of the brew, but without removing the airlock/opening the bucket lid (which you'd have to do anyway if you were controlling the amount of O2 by using compressed oxygen and getting it into the batch with an air stone), you wouldn't get any air/O2 into the batch would you. You'd just be bringing any sediment back into suspension and making additional nucleation points for the dissolved CO2/carbonic acid to attach too, and then escape as bubbles/gas. And if you've made a batch, especially with fruit in primary, any agitation/stirring can create a lot of foam, which, if the fermenter has a small(ish) access hole (top of a carboy etc), can cause a mead eruption, as it's quite a quick reaction - and why with fruit in primary recipes, it's often suggested to start them in a bucket, as it gives greater surface area for the foam to rise up in and not to blow out the top and all over the place......
 
What he said ^ :rockin:

Beyond that, a story: my family went out to the renaissance faire this weekend. Since I now have three...no, four...variants of mead going I was looking for a decent glass of mead while I was there. Well, I did find a glass, but... I think they started it two weeks ago. It was yeasty which meant I couldn't have drunk it if I'd wanted to (I'm allergic to yeast and I am being very careful with my wines about letting it EVER get into bottles) but I didn't want to. It was GAWDAWFUL. Backsweetened to death, cloudy, yeasty...

And you know, it might have been just fine if they'd given it a year. If they make up a batch NOW and serve it NEXT year it might be great. If they make it now and serve it TWO years from now, it will be great.

The moral of the story is, patience is a virtue and won't make your guests gag.
 
Awesome advice,

I am patient (lazy) and have no problem aging my wines...Unfortunately I am doing this with a group of University students, therefore bottling must occur at the end of the academic year, allowing for 6 months of fermentation.


A - It's my understanding that yeast have a harder time fermenting residual sugars the higher that the ABV% is...So my approach is to make a 9% ABV mead. I intend to use a mead-specific yeast strain for flavor, but I am wondering whether I should add an aggressive wine yeast towards the end of primary fermentation in order to reduce the time required for those residual sugars to be metabolized...Does this make sense? or would the mead-specific yeast be aggressive enough to accomplish this on it's own, provided that it is capable of ferrmenting high ABV%s.....?

B - Regarding the yeast sediment in bottle primed sparkling mead...I know that this is more of a wine, but I really don't understand why this is any more of an issue than it is with beer...Typically I put the bottle in the fridge for a day or two, and you can pour most of the bottle without disturbing the sediment too much....

C - Throughout bulk aging, it's my understanding that the composition of the mead changes. I would like to know a general overview of what chemical reactions are occuring that result in this change of flavor...

D - It's my understanding that temperature stability is an important factor in terms of the changing chemical composition of the mead during bulk aging, hence why bottling early poses the risk of inconsistency due to climactic fluctuation. Would it therefore be sensible to insulate each individual bottle by wrapping them in a towel/paper, in addition to storing them in a relatively temperature-stable room?

E - If temperature stability is important for the changing chemical composition of the mead during aging, does this therefore imply that cold crashing should only be executed prior to bottling, or would it be equally acceptable to cold crash prior to racking throughout the aging process (after fermentation is complete)?
 
Awesome advice,

I am patient (lazy) and have no problem aging my wines...Unfortunately I am doing this with a group of University students, therefore bottling must occur at the end of the academic year, allowing for 6 months of fermentation.
That's easy, just make a JAO batch. 3 months to ferment and clear (it's a bit of a bugger to rack off, as the bread yeast sediment is brought back into suspension very easily) just move the carboy the day before to the place where the actual racking will occur, then rack carefully - if the fruit has all sunk then there's no danger of any sediment off it. Rack down to the level where you feel confident that you haven't picked up any sediment, into bottles. Then take an old pop/soda bottle (plastic with the 4 molded feet) and cut the top off it - rack the rest into that (a little sediment doesn't matter), then cover it with cling wrap and put it in the fridge over night. The next day, any sediment should have settled into the molded feet of the bottle base. Move it a couple of hours before you actually rack the last bit out, that way, any sediment that does get disturbed, should have settled back down. Bingo! minimised racking losses....
A - It's my understanding that yeast have a harder time fermenting residual sugars the higher that the ABV% is...So my approach is to make a 9% ABV mead. I intend to use a mead-specific yeast strain for flavor, but I am wondering whether I should add an aggressive wine yeast towards the end of primary fermentation in order to reduce the time required for those residual sugars to be metabolized...Does this make sense? or would the mead-specific yeast be aggressive enough to accomplish this on it's own, provided that it is capable of ferrmenting high ABV%s.....?
Most wine yeasts will handle 14% ABV easily. A 100 point gravity drop equates to about 13.5% ABV. The levels that you're alluding to are when you're needing something like a 133 point drop which is about the 18% mark. Which is also doable, with a few extra bits of fermentation management.

"Mead specific" yeast is complete bollocks. How in hells name to "they" know what yeasts were originally used to call something a "mead yeast" ? There's no records that far back that would enable "them" to identify the original strain. In any case, if you looked up historic/archaic recipes, you get stuff like "adding slices of moldy bread", so the strain could be anything (or as is more likely, advertising/marketing bull, just to sell more yeast).

Plus, some of the so called "mead yeasts" are hard work e.g. the wyeast sweet mead yeast is notorious for stuck ferments, not starting and other issues. Yes, it's fair to point out that some have had success with it, but I'm not one of those. I've tried it with varying gravity musts 3 times and all 3 times it's failed to start.

The late Brother Adam (of Buckfast Abbey bee breeding, mead making fame) originally used "Maury" yeast - the closest we (me and some others from over at Gotmead) have got to identifying that, is Lalvin D21. When Bro Adam couldn't get that, he changed to using the Montpellier strain, which used to be packaged as Gervin Varietal "E", also, conveniently, it's the same as the Lalvin K1-V1116 strain.

He also said that only "soft" water should be used, as hard water can give some "off" flavours.

Apart from the issue of "mead yeast" being, possibly, hard work. It seems that if you insist on wanting to use liquid yeasts, then make a starter. A pack of dry yeast has many times the number of yeast cells that a pack of liquid yeast has.
B - Regarding the yeast sediment in bottle primed sparkling mead...I know that this is more of a wine, but I really don't understand why this is any more of an issue than it is with beer...Typically I put the bottle in the fridge for a day or two, and you can pour most of the bottle without disturbing the sediment too much....
That's fine. If you have a steady enough hand to leave any sediment from bottle conditioning in the bottle, then great. Though it can affect the appearance as you've already alluded to, plus should anyone who might have some sort of yeast allergy get some, then I wouldn't like to predict who'd get nailed to the mast for that.......

Your choice!
C - Throughout bulk aging, it's my understanding that the composition of the mead changes. I would like to know a general overview of what chemical reactions are occuring that result in this change of flavor...
Haven't actually found any info about the exact detail of what happens, other than experience that has taught me that many young meads just taste bloody horrible. One of the regular "off" tastes you will experience, is "alcohol hot". Now as long as it's not something like fusels produced by the ferment (example being D47 fermented at over 70F/21C - despite it having a published temperature ability above that level, but it seems to be a "mead thing"), then the only way to explain it, is that "it mellows with time". It's often gone in 6 months to a year. Other flavours also change, like sometimes you'd get a batch that seems almost bland, maybe flabby, but with time, it seems to recover some of the honey notes/characteristics and with that, some perceived sweetness (not actual, measurable sweetness).
D - It's my understanding that temperature stability is an important factor in terms of the changing chemical composition of the mead during bulk aging, hence why bottling early poses the risk of inconsistency due to climactic fluctuation. Would it therefore be sensible to insulate each individual bottle by wrapping them in a towel/paper, in addition to storing them in a relatively temperature-stable room?

E - If temperature stability is important for the changing chemical composition of the mead during aging, does this therefore imply that cold crashing should only be executed prior to bottling, or would it be equally acceptable to cold crash prior to racking throughout the aging process (after fermentation is complete)?
Any method that might reduce temperature swings while it's ageing could be considered beneficial. Just that thanks to historical technique from the wine world, it's been found that, apparently, the ideal storage temp for ageing is in the low to mid-50's. I seem to recall that this was found, pretty much accidentally, by French vineyards who would store their product in dry, cool caves.

What's actually happening with these gentle, slow chemical changes in meads is anyones guess. Whether there is any academic study on them, I don't know. I haven't found any, but that doesn't mean there isn't any. Just remember, that the resurgence in interest in meads and their making, is a relatively recent thing. So it hasn't been put under as much scrutiny as wine making. Even with wines, it's the older, more historic types that have received most investigation.

As for temperature stability, as I alluded to before. Most of us don't have the facility to mimick a cool, dry cave or some spooky underground wine cellar. The nearest we can get to is to find the coolest practical place, that is frost/cold free and bulk store. Then at least we get a consistent product i.e. the home brew compromise. Apart from anything else, a 5 gallon carboy, takes up less room than the equivalent amount in individual bottles.

Cold crashing is usually done to help a brew clear quicker. Whether the low temp actually changes the electrical charge of the yeast/sediment or what, I don't know. Other than to say that it helps some/most meads clear quicker.

Also, those who insist on making high gravity musts because they want X amount of residual sugars left, have also noted that because the stabilising technique doesn't actually "kill" the yeast off (the sulphite stuns the yeast and the sorbate stops it multiplying), that the cold crashing process does to the yeast, what the onset of winter does. Puts it to sleep/hybernation. Plus as it helps it drop out of suspension quicker, it means that it's more easily racked off, so that the addition of stabilising chems stops any further, possible refermentation.

It's not a 100% guaranteed method, but it's been found to work and seems quite effective. The amount of time for the batch to be chilled seems to vary, as to who's experiences you're reading about, but it would appear that about a week or so at 1 to 4C/34 to 39F does the trick. Whether you have access to a fridge that will accommodate a 5 gallon fermenter for a whole week without receiving ear ache from your nearest and dearest is a completely different question........:D

p.s. as an "aside'', I've just had a quick look at google. The first link that seems to come from a "credible" authority was on the 8th page of god alone knows how many pages. So this link might have some of the info you're looking to get. There was a few bits from winemaker magazine about meads, but after checking the first 15 pages of results, I couldn't see anything that looked even remotely like academic research. It was all forums, blogs, etc i.e. basically anecdotal.
 
Back
Top