Hey all,
Backstory: So, a brown ale I bottled a few months ago had a bit of an issue. The issue was that I can be a big dummy when not paying attention, and added priming sugar twice. (Don't ask how, it had been a long day. I promise I'm not usually that much of a moron.) I believe the bottles were at around 3.8 volumes of CO2, and I was extremely lucky, because they held together without becoming a bunch of grenades. Since it was a brown ale with lots of oats, it had crazy head, and so what would happen was I'd open the bottle, foam would gush out for a good five minutes, and then the foam would hang around pretty much forever, and continue to form even after pouring.
This got me thinking; this level of carbonation close to the range recommended for some wheat and Belgian beers (which IIRC, can go up to 4 volumes). If this explosive brown was carbonated to a similar level as, say, Westmalle Tripel, why doesn't the Westmalle gusher the same way?
There was a lot of sediment in the bottle, which gives me two theories:
1) Fermentation re-started after bottling, and I had more than 3.8 volumes, and the "Nittany Ale" bottles from Midwest are super-strong.
2) Something in the sediment acted as a nucleation point, and pressure drop from opening the cap + high carbonation + nucleation sites + tons of foam positive proteins = mess.
Can anyone tell me if one or both of these theories is possible, or will it remain the mystery of the expoding brown? Or am I just misinformed about the level of carbonation in wheat and Belgian beers?
Thanks all!
topher
PS. In case you're curious, I ended up dumping the last few, because I was annoyed by how difficult it was to serve, and because I had re-brewed it. Nut Brown Mark II was bottled last night, this time with an appropriate amount of priming sugar.
Backstory: So, a brown ale I bottled a few months ago had a bit of an issue. The issue was that I can be a big dummy when not paying attention, and added priming sugar twice. (Don't ask how, it had been a long day. I promise I'm not usually that much of a moron.) I believe the bottles were at around 3.8 volumes of CO2, and I was extremely lucky, because they held together without becoming a bunch of grenades. Since it was a brown ale with lots of oats, it had crazy head, and so what would happen was I'd open the bottle, foam would gush out for a good five minutes, and then the foam would hang around pretty much forever, and continue to form even after pouring.
This got me thinking; this level of carbonation close to the range recommended for some wheat and Belgian beers (which IIRC, can go up to 4 volumes). If this explosive brown was carbonated to a similar level as, say, Westmalle Tripel, why doesn't the Westmalle gusher the same way?
There was a lot of sediment in the bottle, which gives me two theories:
1) Fermentation re-started after bottling, and I had more than 3.8 volumes, and the "Nittany Ale" bottles from Midwest are super-strong.
2) Something in the sediment acted as a nucleation point, and pressure drop from opening the cap + high carbonation + nucleation sites + tons of foam positive proteins = mess.
Can anyone tell me if one or both of these theories is possible, or will it remain the mystery of the expoding brown? Or am I just misinformed about the level of carbonation in wheat and Belgian beers?
Thanks all!
topher
PS. In case you're curious, I ended up dumping the last few, because I was annoyed by how difficult it was to serve, and because I had re-brewed it. Nut Brown Mark II was bottled last night, this time with an appropriate amount of priming sugar.