• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

First Batch in the Pail

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

avi8tor

Active Member
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I purchased a kit yesterday and it's bubbling this morning. I bought a cream ale and screwed up from the start but hope its not a big issue. I seeped the grains for 20 mins and then added the extract. Reversed according to the instructions but I think the wort turned out fine as I stuck to the boiling timings. No burning or anything like that.

My wife commented on how great it smelled this morning so I think we're off to a great start.

Just a couple of questions:

1. My OG was right on at 1.05 but when I tested this morning it had not changed. I'm working from a satellite sample but suspect it just takes time (hardest part).
2. The closet I am keeping it in stays at 75. Seems a bit warm from reading all the posts here. I am thinking of picking up a thermostat controller for my unused deep freezer. Would this be a good idea to keep the fermentation down to around 68? I want to eventually do lagers so think it would be the right thing to do.

I'm excited and can't wait to do another.
 
Steeping the grains before adding the extract is normal. You did well.

1. Patience
2.Yes. But if you don't use the freezer, can I have it? ;)

Welcome aboard, and congrats on your new obsession! :D
 
A means to control fermentation temperatures is one of the best ways to improve your beer and get more consistent results. If you have the means to do so, go ahead.

Adding the extract at the end of the boil (10 min. or so) seems to be the preferred method. Extract has been boiled sufficiently in it's manufacture. Steeping for 20 minuets in 160 degree water is fine.

In the meantime, there are lots of tips on keeping your beer a few degrees cooler. Try the search function. Setting the bucket in a tupperware tub or can with a cool water bath works great. Just add a little ice as needed.
 
Wait, the recipe wanted you to add the extract first and THEN steep the grains? That's just wrong.

1) There's absolutely no reason to check the gravity of your beer after only one day. One week is more like it. Your beer probably just started fermenting. BTW, what the heck is a satellite sample? If your beer has a high enough gravity to cause your hydrometer samples to orbit around it, you probably did something wrong.

2) A 75 degree temperature can cause some problems. It can cause off flavors even if the ambient temperature is 70F, which is what happened with my first homebrew. If you can't get a refrigeration controller setup working soon, I'd look into putting the fermenter into a water bath. The water takes a long time to be brought up to room temperature, and if it does you can add water bottles filled with ice to bring the water temperature back down. Try to do this as soon as possible, because the off flavors are generated in the early part of fermentation (when it's bubbling and churning away). If you do get off flavors (I had a strong banana and solvent flavor), it's not the end of the world. They do mellow with time. At week 6 in the bottle, my beer is actually pretty good now. But a little effort now can save you the frustration.
 
1) There's absolutely no reason to check the gravity of your beer after only one day. One week is more like it.

I would agree, except that he said it was satellite. That's a great way to learn the basics of the process and what is going on with the brew even though a satellite does not accurately represent the real brew.
 
Thanks for the advice and information! I'll pick that controller up tomorrow and get the bucket in lower temps today. I'm in NC so I suspect that I will have trouble this summer as temps can get to 104.

Satellite sample: I took a sanitized cup, dipped it in the wort before making it airtight and put it in a bottle lightly covered and stored it with the 5 gallons so I wouldn't have to crack the fermentation bucket over and over again and I want to see how this all works :)

Sorry Gnome. The beer took the freezer.
 
As a new brewer myself I understand that time is the hardest part. I made a batch two weeks in a row, so I have one in secondary and one still in primary. As soon as I get a chance to get to the LHBS I'm gonna get another primary vessel and brew again. The key is to have several brews going at once, so you don't have to come home and stare at a lone ale aging in the carboy.

As far as your gravity goes I don't think it's a terrible idea to check it early and often for the first batch. I did that and I have a better understanding of whats happening now. However they are right, unless it's for educational purposes there is no reason to check the gravity for a week or so. You're gonna be leaving it in the primary for at least that long anyway, regardless of the readings. Calculate maybe 10ish days in primary and 2-3 weeks in secondary, plus 3 weeks in bottle conditioning to sort of get an idea of the excruciating timeframe lol. Not to say it can't be done sooner.

Grats on the brew!
 
Personally I would have used a larger satellite than one cup. However, it's a tough sacrifice to make, especially on the first brew. Anyting that stops you Continually messing with the real brew is a bonus though. :)
 
I recall my dad making homebrew and blowing bottles up left and right because he couldn't wait. I think I he passed that gene on to me.

I'll have my wife lock it up and keep the key.

I was already thinking about another fermenter bucket :)

Think I'm hooked and I haven't even had my first beer yet.
 
Personally I would have used a larger satellite than one cup. However, it's a tough sacrifice to make, especially on the first brew. Anyting that stops you Continually messing with the real brew is a bonus though. :)

I took 24 oz for the sample :) Or did you mean having more than one sample? (Split)
 
I took 24 oz for the sample :) Or did you mean having more than one sample? (Split)

24oz? OK, Thats a big cup!! :cross: I commend your difficult sacrifice in the pursuit of beer knowledge, sir! :mug: I was thinking you meant like a tea cup or something that would barely fill the hydro tube. :eek:
 
I'm from actually IN Southampton. That makes me superior ;) Not much going on in the UK brewer's group. :(


Sorry, Avi8tor, back to your thread. :)
 
Thanks Gnome, I take a bow to you ... and OH, is where the superior race go? Got to admit it, this forum is just great ... if it was in the UK, might have been worth joining a group.

Yeah, and sorry for being off-topic.

Back to you guys.
 
Sounds like you did really well on your first batch. Just be aware that satellite fermentation is NOT accurate. Five gallons ferments at a different rate the 8 ounces. You will need to check your 5 gallon batch before you bottle or you may follow in your Dad's footprints and have bombs.

Satellite sample: I took a sanitized cup, dipped it in the wort before making it airtight and put it in a bottle lightly covered and stored it with the 5 gallons so I wouldn't have to crack the fermentation bucket over and over again and I want to see how this all works :)

There is no reason to crack your bucket open over and over. I take a reading when it goes into primary and before I close it. I take another several weeks later when I open it to rack the beer.
 
There is no reason to crack your bucket open over and over. I take a reading when it goes into primary and before I close it. I take another several weeks later when I open it to rack the beer.

I leave an hydrometer in the primary - to take a quick 'peek' now and again. As long as nothing has stuck to it, and it's been sterilized, I find it a great way to monitor the end of the primary stage. It has saved my brews several times from 'stuck' ferments.

Hope it helps.

YeastGardener.
 
I leave an hydrometer in the primary - to take a quick 'peek' now and again. As long as nothing has stuck to it, and it's been sterilized, I find it a great way to monitor the end of the primary stage. It has saved my brews several times from 'stuck' ferments.

Hope it helps.

YeastGardener.

This works until you break your hydrometer in your primary and have to toss the entire batch. :eek:
 
Welcome, UK, it sounds like you're on the right track!

I take a reading every three days or so, just to check up on progress, but it really doesn't need to be done too often until, like someone said above, you get a week on in the primary. After all, you're probably going to leave it in primary for at least 2 weeks, right? You can even leave it in there for a month or so, to allow it to clear and then bottle or keg directly.
 
Just curious because I didn't see it mentioned, you did collect your satellite after pitching yeast or pitched a small amount of yeast into it right? I noticed you said it didn't drop gravity at all.
Congrats and welcome to the obsession!
But seriously, if you can get your ferment temps down and patiently leave the beer in primary for around three weeks it will pay off :mug:
 
Oh oh. I can't remember. I think after pitching because I see a bit of foam in the bottle.

If not, I'll just wait a week and pull the lid and take another sample.

I got the fermenter down to 70 degrees and that will have to do until I can get the controller for my freezer tomorrow. Realize the first 72 hours is the most critical so we'll see in about a month I guess :(

EDIT: just checked the sample again and its definately working. Down to 1.048. Not a big change but its been less than 24 hours.
 
I would agree, except that he said it was satellite. That's a great way to learn the basics of the process and what is going on with the brew even though a satellite does not accurately represent the real brew.

I used a satellite on my first brew, just like 10 ounces in a bottle, the directions suggested it.
Why isn't this an accurate way to check progress of the beer?
 
I used a satellite on my first brew, just like 10 ounces in a bottle, the directions suggested it.
Why isn't this an accurate way to check progress of the beer?

Probably a miriad of reasons. The first being that in a smaller vessel, the fermentation temperature will be different. Secondly, I believe that the yeast will not act the same in a smaller vessel Something to do, maybe with available oxygen (I have nothing but instinct to back that up)

Ether way. The satellite can never really be stored in conditions exactly the same as the master. Yeast are pretty violent in the initial stages of fermentaion. That can make big differences in a short period of time.

That is not to say that a satellite is not a good way to learn. I think it is a great idea!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top