But this isn't' a hit facing the boards or a blind side across blue line hit. Voracek essentially gave himself a hospital pass. When the puck is behind you and there is a defenseman in front of you, you don't put your head down and try to pull the puck forward. You stop and put it on your forehand. I'm sorry, but this is self inflicted. The violence of the hit can't be what determines if it is legal or not. Otherwise you'll have checking turn into rubbing guys into the boards. Open ice hits are by definition violent.
I just can't justify this as a suspension worthy hit. Why does Kronwall have to let up? Why can't Voracek let up?
I didn't say it was suspension worthy. Just that I was surprised there was no call on the play based on how quick the whistle blows (when it's not a Flyer hit) any time a hit involves the head.
Obviously you don't get suspended for being boarded when you're the guy who turns last minute making yourself vulnerable. Same thing here. You can see in the replay that he did look up as soon as he got the puck on his stick. What makes Kronwall's hit even more malicious was he was stepping up for the hit before Voracek even had the puck on his stick. As soon as he got the puck on his stick, his head comes up.
Why does Kronwall have to let up? Because the intent should be to disrupt the play, not hurt someone and you know you're going to hurt someone when you hit him like a freight train and the head is the first point of contact.
I love open ice hits, and I actually didn't care for the rule about the "blindside" open ice hit as you need to have your head on a swivel. I'm all about not targeting the head, but shoulder to shoulder should be good at any point/position on the ice. Hitting is part of the game, but trying to kill each other is what has shortened careers. Look at the hits Kasparaitis and Stevens put on people (they definitely contributed to the shortening/ending of Lindross's career).