Thanks, Im looking forward to learning a lot.I concur, @madhook - I eschew thread proliferation - and welcome to HBT!![]()
I don't think it's about mash time as much is it's about conversion. I have been using iodine to check for conversion, and have seen different times to reach that point, doing the same recipe. Letting the mash temp drop, is not the end of the world, and you may find a better fermentation happens.A lot of this is good to know in theory, but isn't necessary or essential for all-grain brewing. Many people (I would assume most) will do a 60 minute mash regardless of the temperature. I'll usually extend my mashes under 152 or so for 30 minutes, unless I'm pressed for time or just feeling lazy. Can't say I've ever really noticed a difference, or one that I can pinpoint to mash time.
I just brewed a porter on Saturday where a one hour mash turned into three hours because I couldn't get my burner working. This is one that regularly finishes at 1.018 to 1.020, with an OG of 1.055. I'll be curious to see if the extra time helps attenuation at all.
Yes, getting complete conversion is more important than mashing for a particular length of time. The time for complete conversion is controlled primarily by the crush. Finer crushes convert faster (since gelatinization is the rate controlling step in conversion.) More reliable, and more quantitative than the iodine test is measuring the SG of the wort in the mash. Learn about measuring conversion efficiency/completeness in real time here.I don't think it's about mash time as much is it's about conversion. I have been using iodine to check for conversion, and have seen different times to reach that point, doing the same recipe. Letting the mash temp drop, is not the end of the world, and you may find a better fermentation happens.