emgesp1
Well-Known Member
FWIW, I'm 6'3"
So, I understand that the cooling is not as efficient as a compressor model but as far as energy consumption, do these suck less juice in given time frame, like 24hr as their compressor counterpart?
This is what I use. Works great for ales, lagers, and crash cooling.
Evilgnome is right, lifting a carboy above the thing is a pain. I use ale pails for my primary though, not nearly as bad. YMMV. I'm a tall guy, though I imagine a stepstool or small ladder would help with some leverage in case you are indeed as tall as a gnome.
Or have a bad back.
(I'm 6'2", BTW)
So, I understand that the cooling is not as efficient as a compressor model but as far as energy consumption, do these suck less juice in given time frame, like 24hr as their compressor counterpart?
I went to Target at lunch to check this out. It says it can hold 37F, I suppose if you wanted to cold crash your carboys at 32, that might be a problem.
Peltier coolers are only about 5 - 10% efficient. So, if you're looking to go "green", don't buy a peltier cooler. Conversely, A/C compressors are about 50% efficient.
The NuCool consumes 100 watts at full power. So, if run at 50% power year round, it will consume (50 / 1000) * 24 * 365 = 438 kWh. At 100% power, it will consume (100 / 1000) * 24 * 365 = 876 kWh.
In my area, that's somewhere between $28 - $55 a year (depending on usage). I can operate a full size (20+ cu ft) modern refrigerator for less than that.. :cross:
I can see on my peltier fridge right behind me, a 55W rating (its smaller than the nucool). I was under the impression this was more efficient than a compressor model. I dont see any flaws in your math, other than perhaps it runs at lower than 50%.