Sorry for my slow reply ... looks like a great beer you have there.
Yes, you are correct in that a thinner mash versus a thicker one (ALL other things being equal) should produce a more fermentable wort. From Fix* (via DeClerk): "It has been known that thicker mashes favor proteoletic activity whereas thinner mashes favor carbohydrase action because of the restraining influence [high] sugar concentrations have on alpha and beta amylase activity."
In other terms, if it's too thick, the enzymes will be prohibited from doing a thorough job of breaking sugars down into fermentables.
I would say that mash temperature plays a MUCH larger role in producing a more or less fermentable wort so, if your process is working for you and you are hitting the mash temps you have designed into your recipe (higher = less fermentable) then the thickness is probably of minor concern. It is, however, one more tool in your brewer's toolbox.
Again, great work.
*Fix, George : Principles of Brewing Science (2nd ed) - 1999
Yes, you are correct in that a thinner mash versus a thicker one (ALL other things being equal) should produce a more fermentable wort. From Fix* (via DeClerk): "It has been known that thicker mashes favor proteoletic activity whereas thinner mashes favor carbohydrase action because of the restraining influence [high] sugar concentrations have on alpha and beta amylase activity."
In other terms, if it's too thick, the enzymes will be prohibited from doing a thorough job of breaking sugars down into fermentables.
I would say that mash temperature plays a MUCH larger role in producing a more or less fermentable wort so, if your process is working for you and you are hitting the mash temps you have designed into your recipe (higher = less fermentable) then the thickness is probably of minor concern. It is, however, one more tool in your brewer's toolbox.
Again, great work.
*Fix, George : Principles of Brewing Science (2nd ed) - 1999