I don't doubt your correct, but the logic doesn't add up to me.Yeah, that's actually why I keep yammering on about a RIMS; 120V is plently of power to maintain and incrementally step up the small volume passing through the tube, but a lot harder to do with the much larger volume in a HERMS/HLT.... I'm just rrying to weigh in heavily on the RIMS vs. HERMS for your situation.
![]()
I understand that the element in a RIMS system we're thinking of (similar to the Blichmann Rims Rocket) has a relatively small amount of wort to heat up and therefore can make large changes to that volume relatively quickly. What I don't understand is how that would translate over to the whole volume of liquid faster than a HERMS.
In my particular plan, let's say I'm mashing 6-7 gallons of wort (not including the grain mind you). If I have to heat that much volume with a RIMS, wouldn't it be slower than if I had a very concentrated HERMS coil (cramp as much coil as possible) in a 5 to 7.5 gallon kettle? I may only be able to fit a few gallons of water in the "HLT" if you can call it that, but my thought was that it would actually be more efficient than RIMS atleast at these volumes? Since I'd only be using this water for reheating and possibly a small sparge, I don't think I'd need more than say 3 gallons in the HERMS HLT.
Is HERMS just significantly less efficient at transferring heat?
Thanks! And boy, we sure have confiscated this thread. OP should report me to the police!