Well everyone, I’m finally ready to post results from my single hop experiment. I posted about this back in October, here.
https://www.homebrewtalk.com/f12/genius-exercise-futility-277563/
The short version is, Bell’s Two Hearted Ale is an amazing beer. It has a simple grain bill and uses nothing but Centennial hops. I found a good clone recipe and got the idea to make it three times, but each time using a different hop. One batch was all-Citra, one was all Simcoe, and one was all Amarillo.
My original plan was to get all three batches ready, buy a sixer of Two Hearted, and then experiment by pouring them together in different proportions. The idea was that, by doing that, I’d get an idea of what a beer that is made with a blend of hops that is, for example, ½ Centennial, ¼ Citra, ¼ Amarillo, etc.
But, as I’m sure people who work in science know, sometimes an experiment takes you off in a different direction. I did blend the batches together like I planned, but as I’ll explain, something kind of unexpected happened and I learned something entirely different from what I expected.
Bottom line is this: I learned that beers, even hoppy IPAs, benefit from a loooooong conditioning period in the bottles. This little experiment, while I planned to learn about hop combinations, made me learn how beers develop in the bottle and helped me to learn a little more patience.
Here’s what I mean and, the best way to explain this is to describe each of the beers and how they developed. First off, each beer used the same grain bill. I did these as half batches, but in a five-gallon batch, it would be the following:
10 lb of 2-row
1 lb. of C-40.
Mash at 152, single infusion, batch sparge.
The original Two Hearted clone planned on Centennial with 9-11 AA%, so I adjusted up and down for the other hops’ AA%. The amounts are:
.75 oz. at 60
1 oz. at 10
2 oz. at 5, and
1 oz. in the dry hop.
In the end, this recipe produced a beautiful amber, crystal clear beer with a fluffy head that left great lacing. Here’s a pic of the clarity (but not so much of the lacing).
https://www.homebrewtalk.com/f12/genius-exercise-futility-277563/
The short version is, Bell’s Two Hearted Ale is an amazing beer. It has a simple grain bill and uses nothing but Centennial hops. I found a good clone recipe and got the idea to make it three times, but each time using a different hop. One batch was all-Citra, one was all Simcoe, and one was all Amarillo.
My original plan was to get all three batches ready, buy a sixer of Two Hearted, and then experiment by pouring them together in different proportions. The idea was that, by doing that, I’d get an idea of what a beer that is made with a blend of hops that is, for example, ½ Centennial, ¼ Citra, ¼ Amarillo, etc.
But, as I’m sure people who work in science know, sometimes an experiment takes you off in a different direction. I did blend the batches together like I planned, but as I’ll explain, something kind of unexpected happened and I learned something entirely different from what I expected.
Bottom line is this: I learned that beers, even hoppy IPAs, benefit from a loooooong conditioning period in the bottles. This little experiment, while I planned to learn about hop combinations, made me learn how beers develop in the bottle and helped me to learn a little more patience.
Here’s what I mean and, the best way to explain this is to describe each of the beers and how they developed. First off, each beer used the same grain bill. I did these as half batches, but in a five-gallon batch, it would be the following:
10 lb of 2-row
1 lb. of C-40.
Mash at 152, single infusion, batch sparge.
The original Two Hearted clone planned on Centennial with 9-11 AA%, so I adjusted up and down for the other hops’ AA%. The amounts are:
.75 oz. at 60
1 oz. at 10
2 oz. at 5, and
1 oz. in the dry hop.
In the end, this recipe produced a beautiful amber, crystal clear beer with a fluffy head that left great lacing. Here’s a pic of the clarity (but not so much of the lacing).