93% efficiency? - Home Brew Forums
Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing > 93% efficiency?
Cool Brewing Giveaway - Supporting Membership Drive & Discount

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-06-2013, 03:50 PM   #1
insanim8er
Registered User
Recipes 
 
Dec 2012
Oregon City, OR
Posts: 1,641
Liked 345 Times on 243 Posts



I just did my first 10 gallon batch last night It's a milk stout clone recipe.

I had problems with my barley crusher, so finally I got it, sorta, working. But I had done a graff the other day where my efficiency was ~ 47% because the gap was too big.

For this milk stout, I got the barley crushed working at a larger than desired gap, so I ran it through twice. It was pretty well crushed by then.

I added the grain to the mash and had a ton of dough balls. I also got my first stuck sparge, but it was easily fixed. I mashed for 75 minutes and I did a fly sparge @ 170f

As I collected the runnings, I let it drain super super slow.

I ran my numbers using homebrewing.com and it says:

Brewhouse Efficiency Calculator
Points/Pound/Gallon (PPG): 32.34
Efficiency: 93.15%

Pre-Boil Gravity: 1.064
Total Fermentable Amt: 22.76 lb
Pre-Boil Wort Amt: 11.5 gal
Fermentable 1: 14lb Two Row
Fermentable 2: 2lb Crystal 60
Fermentable 3: 1.50lb Munich
Fermentable 4: 1.50lb Roasted Barley
Fermentable 5: 1.50lb Chocolate
Fermentable 6: 1.25lb Flaked barley
Fermentable 7: 1.00lb Flaked oats


Is it really possible to get that High of an efficiency, or is something wrong?

If it's important, I have a 10 gallon mash tun with false bottom my mash temp was at 151f



 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 03:57 PM   #2
Shred
Beer Brewer & Blogger
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
Shred's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Dec 2012
Manchester, CT
Posts: 1,089
Liked 189 Times on 129 Posts


An efficiency that high is not desirable. I'd attribute it to crushing the grains too fine.


__________________
- Shred

Check out my blog!
www.ShredsHomebrews.com

On Tap: Belgstralian White IPA, Bourbon Barrel Conceited Dick, HBC438 SMaSH, Barrel Aged Old Shredsputin, Geest Belgian Golden Strong

Primary 1: Grapefruit IIPA
Primary 2: Shred's Brown Eye Ale
Primary 3: Chocolate Orange Port
Primary 4: California Pinot Noir

Secondary: Ginger-Peach Melomel

rniles Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 04:17 PM   #3
chickypad
lupulin shift victim
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
chickypad's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jul 2010
SF Peninsula
Posts: 4,867
Liked 835 Times on 681 Posts


I'll ask the obligatory questions about ruling out a measurement error. Is your hydrometer calibrated, did you cool the sample before measuring (given that correction factors often don't work well at high temps), stir the wort thoroughly before taking your sample, accurately measure your pre-boil volume?

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 04:37 PM   #4
insanim8er
Registered User
Recipes 
 
Dec 2012
Oregon City, OR
Posts: 1,641
Liked 345 Times on 243 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by chickypad View Post
I'll ask the obligatory questions about ruling out a measurement error. Is your hydrometer calibrated, did you cool the sample before measuring (given that correction factors often don't work well at high temps), stir the wort thoroughly before taking your sample, accurately measure your pre-boil volume?
Refractometer readings ... Numbers were taken several times and "corrected" and it's auto calibrating for high temps, so I can take readings during the boil. I live in Portland Oregon, and we have awesome water. So I generally add my water straight to the kettle then boil it for a while. I always use that water to calibrate my refractometer to 0 before I start the mash.

And yes, the wort was fully stirred. No question about that.

I read high efficiency is one of those widely debated issues. Some say bad, some say its fine.

I'm not aiming to be that high. I felt the grain was too course during the first crush. I adjusted it to the proper thickness for the second crush but felt it was too fine after that second crush. I even added rice hulls to the mash because I was a bit concerned of a stuck mashed. I did get one, but it was a simple fix and didn't give any more issues after.

I'm probably selling this barley crusher to get something else. I read a lot of people have the issue I had with it not pulling the grain down.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 04:43 PM   #5
Trail
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
Trail's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2011
Colchester, Vermont
Posts: 654
Liked 60 Times on 53 Posts


With an ultra fine, coarse flour level grind like I use for BIAB, I get 83%. I don't think you are really getting 93%, especially considering your dough balls - much more likely you overestimated volume.
__________________
Kegged: Honey Steam Pilsner
Bottled: Nada
Primary: Worst Best Bitter

Quote:
Originally Posted by brown_dog_us View Post
The first step is locating a cheap pasta maker. Are you married? If so you probably got one as a wedding present.

2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 04:49 PM   #6
insanim8er
Registered User
Recipes 
 
Dec 2012
Oregon City, OR
Posts: 1,641
Liked 345 Times on 243 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Trail View Post
With an ultra fine, coarse flour level grind like I use for BIAB, I get 83%. I don't think you are really getting 93%, especially considering your dough balls - much more likely you overestimated volume.
I have a 20 gallon blichmann boilermaker. The pot was level and the sight gauge is what I was reading off of. It was right at 11.5 gallons.

Why because of the dough balls?

My buddy poured slow while I stirred. There was a lot of powder and the balls formed on the top of the water. I managed to crush them and dissolve them pretty well. I feel we did a good job of mixing the mash.

Idk... all I know is during the boil my gravity was way high. I ended up with 11 gallons at 1.077 (before the lactose addition) after adding more wort at 1.019 from the last of the fly sparge runnings.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 07:33 PM   #7
Trail
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
 
Trail's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Sep 2011
Colchester, Vermont
Posts: 654
Liked 60 Times on 53 Posts


Because dough balls decrease efficiency. 93% efficiency would be unlikely even if everything went right... which it sounds like it didn't.

If your volumes were correct, it's likely you used more grain than you thought. Or that you temp corrected your hydrometer meter reading wrong.

Bottom line is, if you actually got 93 efficiency on the batch there's something up with your water PH (and probably not in a good way.)
__________________
Kegged: Honey Steam Pilsner
Bottled: Nada
Primary: Worst Best Bitter

Quote:
Originally Posted by brown_dog_us View Post
The first step is locating a cheap pasta maker. Are you married? If so you probably got one as a wedding present.

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 08:31 PM   #8
insanim8er
Registered User
Recipes 
 
Dec 2012
Oregon City, OR
Posts: 1,641
Liked 345 Times on 243 Posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Trail View Post
Because dough balls decrease efficiency. 93% efficiency would be unlikely even if everything went right... which it sounds like it didn't.

If your volumes were correct, it's likely you used more grain than you thought. Or that you temp corrected your hydrometer meter reading wrong.

Bottom line is, if you actually got 93 efficiency on the batch there's something up with your water PH (and probably not in a good way.)
The dough balls formed and got broken up, as I said before he added it slow while I stirred. They formed on top and got mixed well. I just meant I saw more than I've seen before. That's because there was a lot more flour in the grain.

I did more research on it. People get 95% efficiency with no problems. I did read about the extractions of tannin possibly being an issue due to PH, but my wort tasted fantastic. And it's one of those debate topics where some say they do high eff and have never had issues while others say its bad.

I'm not dumb. I know I used the proper weight. I know I calibrated my refractometer. I have good equipment.

I'm pretty sure now that with fly sparging, doing a 75 minute mash and having of too fine a crush is why it's so high.

I believe the numbers now that I read more about it. I just have to wait and see if I have off flavors because of it, but I'm pretty sure it's going to be ok since the wort was amazing. But I'll be aiming more for 75-80%

 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 11:31 PM   #9
hoppus
Recipes 
 
Jan 2013
Hartford, CT
Posts: 68
Liked 12 Times on 10 Posts


I'm usually in the 85-90% range for efficiency so I wouldn't worry about that. I'd really like to hear why high efficiency is bad. Sounds a bit like a pervasive myth.

justkev52 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2013, 11:42 PM   #10
sfrisby
HBT_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
 
sfrisby's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Jan 2011
Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,782
Liked 264 Times on 177 Posts


You absolutely can get 93% efficiency. I once got 104%! That is my record.



 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do people report mash efficiency or brewhouse efficiency? thisoneguy All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 66 07-25-2012 05:37 AM
Mash Efficiency vs Brewhouse Efficiency exe Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 22 12-22-2011 07:09 PM
Mash efficiency vs Post boil efficiency RootDownBrewing Beginners Beer Brewing Forum 1 08-21-2011 12:33 PM
Increassing efficiency or making up for low efficiency mcarb All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 20 01-12-2011 04:29 PM
calculating efficiency vs brewhouse efficiency inchrisin General Beer Discussion 1 01-25-2010 12:50 AM


Forum Jump