The standard is 1.25 qts/lb. I personally have went down to 1 qt/lb to minimize the water above my grainbed.
kai did some experiments on this. Here's the writeup in pdf form. He was also a guest on Basic Brewing Radio on November 20th.
To summarize his results, mash thickness does not have a significant affect on attenuation, but thinner mashes (2 qts/lb) resulted in a sizeable increase in efficiency.
One thing I have wondered about, however, is that it may be that the ratio of mash to sparge water is a greater influence on brewhouse efficiency than mash thickness alone. So, thin mashes may increase efficiency for low-gravity brews, but it may decrease efficiency in high-gravity brews because there would be so little sparge water.
For people that are using 1 qt/lb what type of mash tun do you have?
I batch sparge. I mash with 1/2 the desired kettle volume plus what the grain will absorb - usually between 1.5 to 2 qts. per lb. Sparge with the other 1/2 of desired kettle volume - try to raise grain bed temp to 168. I get 75-80% on most beers and 65-70% on big beers.
If you're looking to maximize efficiency, this is the way to do it. According to Kai's pdf, there is no attenuation difference between thick and thin mashes, so the only reason not to maximize efficiency in this manner is for simplicity.
What is the best Mash Ratio Qts/LBS?
does anybody do no sparge in a cooler or is that dumb?
I go with 1qt/lb on top of the 3/4 of a gallon that sits under my false bottom.
For people that are using 1 qt/lb what type of mash tun do you have?
Enter your email address to join: