s3kt0r
Member
So, I've read around a few threads on secondary conditioning and when to bottle and such, but a lot of it applies to normal gravity beers. Since this is my first High Gravity, I'd like to run my plans I parsed from the threads by the experts to see if it sounds like the wise thing to do.
I brewed a Belgian Tripel that had an OG of 1.110. After two weeks of sitting in the primary, it got down to 1.020, which was much better than I was expecting. I checked it again today (a week later, so a total of three weeks in the primary) and the gravity hasn't changed.
Anyway, I was planning on leaving it there for another week to be sure and then racking it to a secondary, where I'd let it condition for a good two months before bottling it. I was thinking of letting it sit in the bottles for three months before trying it. It's like the 1-2-3 suggestion, but with months instead of weeks.
Does this sound reasonable. Too long? Too short? Doesn't really matter?
I brewed a Belgian Tripel that had an OG of 1.110. After two weeks of sitting in the primary, it got down to 1.020, which was much better than I was expecting. I checked it again today (a week later, so a total of three weeks in the primary) and the gravity hasn't changed.
Anyway, I was planning on leaving it there for another week to be sure and then racking it to a secondary, where I'd let it condition for a good two months before bottling it. I was thinking of letting it sit in the bottles for three months before trying it. It's like the 1-2-3 suggestion, but with months instead of weeks.
Does this sound reasonable. Too long? Too short? Doesn't really matter?