Neither do I.
I just don't like to boil my hops for more than an hour.
My house is at about 4000'. I boil off about 1.5 gallons and hour.
Surface area of exposed liquid and boil vigor have a lot to do with boil-off.
I love the fact that homebrewing allows us to brew what we want the way we want to do it.
The fact is...the same recipe boiled for 2 minutes or 2 hours, will deliver a different finished product.
Boiling the same recipe with electricity, or propane or wood fire or hot rocks will all deliver a...
Well....now that DMS is off the table....
A 90 minute boil remains a great way to increase the caramelized malty character in the right brew. I feel that brewing an old recipe with "new techniques" is like wearing a belt with suspenders.....its weird.
I've never understood the idea of a...
I have a few recipes that I always boil for 90 mins, I also boil many for 60.
There is a big difference. Boiling for 90 minutes gets rid of a lot more water leaving you a much maltier brew with a heavier mouth-feel.
I go 90 mins with my Scottish ales, Wee Heavys and the like.
I recommend...
Yes, In my opinion.
I think 20 to 30 minutes each would gross you a much higher efficiency.
I know waiting around for an hour in the middle of your brew sesh is kinda boring, but I think it will pay off big time by way of ABV in your final product.