Should I
Should I have used Nottingham in the first place? It seemed like 007 was a good choice. Shouldn't I have done better? I made a 2 quart starter. The wort was well oxygenated. I was expecting a better FG since I hit the other Beersmith numbers. Thanks for the response.
My latest beer is a barleywine type brew with 1.098 OG. The yeast is WLP007, which seemed a good yeast for this fermentation. I pitched a large starter and things took off quickly. After about three weeks my temperature controller malfunctioned(Inkbird) and essentially cold crashed the beer...
The beer in question is an imperial stout with an OG of 1.099. Everything went fine and I hit all my numbers, including a FG of 1.018, at which time I transferred this 5 gallon batch to a bourbon barrel. After four months I bottled with one cup of corn sugar and Lallemand CBC-1...
The yeast is Wyeast #1762, which is the yeast they recommend for imperial stout. Sorry, should've said that. The fact that my FG matches the software would suggest this yeast was happy in this beer. You mentioned doing some online research, is there info out there regarding the residual yeast...
I'm getting ready to bottle a 5 gallon batch of imperial stout that has been barrel aged. I hit all my numbers per BeerSmith, including the measured FG of 1.018, so I will assume the ABV is the estimate 10.9%. My question is, should I introduce yeast to this beer at bottling time to get...