 |
|
02-28-2008, 03:35 PM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Louisville CO
Posts: 6
|
I Need Help with my Belgian Wit
|
|
I Just popped opened the lid on my fermenter to check the Gravity. There was lots of foam and krausen on top. The reading i got was like 1.010- 011 with a s.g. of 1.050. Indicating this beer is finished? I still have lots of airlock activity. a bubble every 20 seconds or so. This beer fermented like a yeast orgy for 3 and a half days, with me having to take the airlock out and put in a makeshift blow off tube. Lots of stuff bubbled out of the tube into the pan of water. My question is if this beer is done (or close) or if the gas escaping is just co2 coming out of solution. I know i need to take gravity readings but im pretty sure its at its estimated FG. (according to beersmith) I dont know this is only my third beer so im a noob. Any help is appreciated. Just dont hate on a noob.
Lynden
|
|
|
02-28-2008, 03:40 PM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lehigh Valley,PA
Posts: 540
Liked 2 Times on 1 Posts
|
You need to wait. The airlock activity tells you almost nothing about how far along you are in the ferment I would let it sit in the primary for at least another week then rack to a secondary for and leave for 2 - 3 weeks. Make a few SG measurements over a 3 day period. If they all the same its done.
I have stopped using secondaries for the most part and just leave my ales in the primary for 3+ weeks.
__________________
Veritas vos Liberabit
Quote:
Originally Posted by chefmike
Dr. Vorlauf.... you are a scary, scary man. Kimchee?!!
|
|
|
|
02-28-2008, 03:53 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southbridge, Ma
Posts: 84
Likes Given: 1
|
Secondaries aren't really recommended for wits as cloudiness is part of the style.
I brewed one last week and plan on bottling after two weeks in the primary (as long as the gravity look alright.)
|
|
|
02-28-2008, 03:56 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: West Chicago 'Burbs, IL
Posts: 3,384
Liked 83 Times on 62 Posts Likes Given: 37
|
Just give it three weeks or so total. You'll be fine. Patience, grasshoppa'
|
|
|
02-28-2008, 03:57 PM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lehigh Valley,PA
Posts: 540
Liked 2 Times on 1 Posts
|
Correct. It has been so long since I have used a secondary that I forgot about the wit style.
Matter of fact I just brewed a Belgian Wheat yesterday. Have no intention of taking it out of the primary other than to bottle.
__________________
Veritas vos Liberabit
Quote:
Originally Posted by chefmike
Dr. Vorlauf.... you are a scary, scary man. Kimchee?!!
|
|
|
|
02-28-2008, 04:15 PM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Halifax, Canada
Posts: 641
Liked 5 Times on 3 Posts
|
If you still had a krausen, then chances are your SG was still dropping. It sounds pretty close to your estimated FG, but it might just keep dropping below it a bit. Either way, I'd go with the advice here to let it sit a total of around three weeks in primary before bottling.
__________________
Next: Tousted Out Stoat, Hop Bomb, Ordinary Bitter
Bubbling: Belgian Summer Bitter, Vienna Steam Beer
Conditioning:Greenwall Lambic
Kegged: Christmas Ale
Bottle Conditioning:
Drinking: Saison Bâtard
The Green Wall Nanobrewery
tibi non nolis
|
|
|
02-28-2008, 10:19 PM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 6,922
Liked 24 Times on 23 Posts Likes Given: 9
|
some yeast strains don't drop their krausen...they just thicken up.
+1 to leave it another 7-10 days, then bottle or keg.
__________________
Malkore
Primary: English Mild
On tap: Pale Ale, Lancelot's Wheat, English Brown Ale, Steam Beer, HoovNuts IPA
Bottled: MOAM, Braggot, Raspberry Melomel, Merlot, Apfelwein, Pyment, Sweet mead, Cabernet
Gal in 2009: 27, Gal in 2010: 34, Gal in 2011: 13, Gal in 2012: 10
|
|
|
02-28-2008, 11:50 PM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Corpus, Texas
Posts: 1,576
Liked 15 Times on 14 Posts Likes Given: 55
|
+1 on patience
|
|
|
02-29-2008, 06:34 AM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 313
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
|
really no secondary on a wit? i understand the logic of it being a hazy style, but still most of what i've read has a secondary ferm. recommendation.
|
|
|
02-29-2008, 12:51 PM
|
#10
|
|
Art by David Shrigley
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nishinomiya, Japan
Posts: 845
Liked 8 Times on 3 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by slim chillingsworth
really no secondary on a wit? i understand the logic of it being a hazy style, but still most of what i've read has a secondary ferm. recommendation.
|
I would say no secondary for any style unless you are adding a fruit or a second yeast (like brett or bugs) or if you are bulk aging more than one month. The old knowledge (aka the first printing of How to Brew) was all geared toward using a secondary, but experience has shown that for most beers it is unneccessary. To any new brewer serious about their brewing I would recommend buying a new copy of How to Brew every brewery/ brewpub I have been in has a dog-earred copy. Sorry for being long winded.
good brewing
__________________
鯰 a.k.a. なまず a.k.a. Catfish
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|