I brewed today with my bag from wilserbrewer. I decided to try a full volume mash with no sparge in my 10 gallon stock pot. "Can I Mash It" said that it would require 8.8 gallons of volume with 8 gallons of water and 10 lbs of grain. It was up to the very top. Not sure what happened there. I left the electric stove element on low for most of the mash and I only lost a degree or two. I wrapped a towel around the pot during the mash and set my cooler mash tun cover on top of the pot because I don't have a stock pot cover. I left my spoon in and stirred it gently several times to even out temperatures.
Side note: I wonder if you need to stir after the initial dough-in with heat that low and a ghetto false bottom. The grain will sink lower in the bag, somewhat insulating the thin part of the mash. As long as the thin part of the mash remains below mash out temps, it should leave the majority of the enzymes intact, right? Kind of like how a decoction removes the thick part of the mash and actually boils it but the majority of the enzymes will continue working because they are in the thin part of the mash (the liquid). It would change the sugar profile of the wort, but that could be desirable. Even if used just for laziness, which was my initial motivation, leaving the heat on low to maintain temps and only stirring when you first add grain and right before you pull out the bag could be very helpful. You would have to try it a couple times while testing things to be sure you won't boil over your mash or something but the high laziness factor there is undeniable.
Anyway...
I found that my large, cheap plastic spaghetti strainer would sit inside a 5 gallon pot that I usually use for heating sparge water. I set it up next to the mash pot and pulled up the bag after a 60 minute mash. It was more inconvenient to lift it than I had expected, partly because the vent hood above my stove is less than a foot above the top of my 10 gallon pot. I pretty much just pulled it out and plopped it right in the strainer. It was mostly drained in a minute or so. I added the 1/2 gallon-ish back to the main pot and realized that I had overshot my boil volume by at least a 1/2 gallon. I'm used to a grain absorption rate of 0.13 gallons per pound. I knew the bag would not hold back as much liquid, so instead of adding 1.3 gallons for my 10lb grain bill, I estimated only 1 gallon absorbed. So I guess its more like .05 gallons per lb of grain. I didn't squeeze the bag while draining. I lifted it and repositioned it a couple of times, but that's it.
I decided to just do a 90 minute boil to lose the extra 1/2 gallon or volume. I had already saved at least 30 minutes by not having to wait for vorlauf and batch sparging and draining. (Heating up my 8 gallons of water from 68F to 159F took AN HOUR though, so no real time savings. Usually it's 5 gallons for strike water and it only takes 25-30 min. I didn't take into consideration the length of time it would take to heat the larger volume of water.
I turned the bag inside out in my 5 gallon pot and then rinsed the bag. It took just as long to rinse out the bag as it does to rinse out my mash tun. No real time savings there today, but I can probably develop a faster method.
The wort was noticeably more cloudy than with my stainless braid mash tun + vorlauf. As it neared boiling, the grain bits in the foam became even more apparent. It was not nearly as grainy as when I tried paint strainer bags for a few 1 gallon batches, but there was obviously more stuff in there than I'm used to with the mash tun. Not a huge problem for me, until the foamy beast tried harder than I've ever seen to boil over. I was blasting it with a squirt bottle with one hand while stirring with the other. I even had to kill the heatstick once. Once it finally broke out into a stable boil, I did my regular thing. I actually got a 5 gallon batch bottled while this one boiled.
When it was done and cooled, I transferred it and noticed a rather large amount of trub/hop gunk. Probably double trub-ble compared to what I had last time I brewed with the mash tun (last week). I did use more hops this time and did not use any hop bags yet.
It was still a 5 hour brew day, due to my underestimating the time the water would take to heat and overestimating how much water I would need. Those things added an hour, so it could easily be a 4 hour brew day next time. There was a big time savings in the full volume mash with the bag vs a batch sparge mash in the mash tun. Even a full volume mash in my mash tun would take much longer to drain overall than the bag.
Storage: I could fit 2000+ bags inside one cooler mash tun. I have limited space, so I really want the bag to work as well or better for me as the cooler does.
I guess time will tell the quality of the beer. As far as the quality of the bags goes, they should last for years with care. I don't know if I would want to hang it from the nylon cord with wet grain in it though. It is just a single layer of voile up to the edge of the openings for the cord. I would prefer if that opening were reinforced to feel sure the cord won't tear through the voile while suspending it. I do like to see things that are overbuilt or heavy duty. These bags are well made and fully functional, but I know there could be a more heavy duty version that could, reasonably, cost more. On the wilserbrewer website, there is a picture of a 145 gallon size bag. That HAS to have additional stitching on it compared to my 10 gallon size bag. That and/or it has some kind of alternate lifting points.
In the end, I'm sure this bag will work fine for a long time. The additional grain particles in the wort don't concern me and I will try using some Irish moss to knock more of the trub down. I give them 9/10.