Tri clamps?

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Oct 26, 2020
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
So I'm looking to build a keggle here pretty soon. I've seen a lot of tutorials and all the parts. But I'm also noticing all the higher end brew kettles (ss brewtech, spike+ etc) all use tri clamp set ups instead of regular nozzles.

I've spent a few days working in local breweries and I won't like the ease of tri clamp is pretty handy so if I could incorporate that in my brewing I'd love too.

I was curious how I would even find the ports and parts to make my keggle tri clamp and if it would even be worth it.
 
I like tri-clamp for my kettle element, but I'm fine with conventional NPT elsewhere, though you're right that tri-clamp sanitary fittings are very popular. Ease? Maybe. I wouldn't want to deal with tri-clamp every time I attach/detach a hose connection -- quick disconnects like camlock work much better for frequent use. For parts, look here for example.
 
I was in the same boat when reimagining my new set-up. I decided to go with QDs for all the hoses and tri-clamps for the elements. I do not regret it at all. The QDs are an amazing upgrade.

1605337650657.png
 
I like tri-clamp for my kettle element, but I'm fine with conventional NPT elsewhere, though you're right that tri-clamp sanitary fittings are very popular. Ease? Maybe. I wouldn't want to deal with tri-clamp every time I attach/detach a hose connection -- quick disconnects like camlock work much better for frequent use. For parts, look here for example.


Thanks ill look into Camlocks!
 
I use camlocks myself, but be aware it takes some practice to be able to use them one-handed vs the pull-back type QD that floppy mentioned. Just something to consider.
 
I use camlocks myself, but be aware it takes some practice to be able to use them one-handed vs the pull-back type QD that floppy mentioned. Just something to consider.
Yes, it's sometimes annoying. I've wondered if things might be a bit easier with these QDs, which could be somewhat lighter weight in addition to simplifying one-handed connect/disconnect. But swapping out all my camlocks for QDs would cost ~$200, so maybe I'll never know...
 
I recently switched back to ball lock QDs from the cam lock type. From what I've seen posted by others, it seems like different sellers, and/or makers, of cam locks are not to the same spec. Which makes connecting them together an issue (PITA). The stainless ball lock style fittings all just work without issue no matter where (or when) I purchased them. I now have a gallon ziplock bag full of the cam lock fittings that I can't see ever using again.

BTW, Spike Brewing has their NPT systems setup with the ball lock type fittings. That should tell you something right there. Of course, they also offer the systems with TC fittings.

I have things connecting to my boil keggle set up with TC fittings. Until it gets to the tubing connection. That's a ball lock type fitting (male on the keggle). All my hoses have the female connector on them. Makes it a LOT easier when all the fittings on the tubing are female and all vessel/pump/chiller fittings are male. When I had first set these up, I had either a mix, or female connections on the vessels. Not as nice when you're trying to move the fitting collar back to connect the tubing after it's been exposed to that much heat for some time.
 
Golddiggie's gender-related remarks make perfect sense: female on hoses, male elsewhere. I have not had camlock compatibility issues, though I do notice differences in the force required to make a connection depending on... something, maybe small variation between makers. Not sure.

@Bobby_M of brewhardware.com fame wrote this guide regarding the OP's decisions. He's got his own perspective:

Quick Disconnects: We can say from experience that if you're designing a system where the pump will draw from several sources and/or pump to several other locations, you will quickly tire of pulling hoses off of barbs to move them around. Quick disconnects are exactly what they sound like and there are several options available:

TC, Triclover, Triclamp - This is a system that features a gasket that sits between two identical flanges and a separate clamp that squeezes the flanges together to make the seal. These are generally considered the most sanitary* and easily cleanable option, but their high cost, bulk, and cumbersome operation make them impractical for all ports on a homebrew scale system.

Camlock - Camlocks or Cam and Groove fittings have been used around the world in industrial applications for decades, usually in much larger sizes than what we use them for. There are a lot of reasons we really like these. For one thing, their dimensions are dictated by Milspec so they should be interchangeable across all vendors. They have very few moving parts so they don't get fouled with sticky wort. They are made of only two food grade components, stainless steel and high temperature silicone. The price is also very favorable. The only downside is that it takes two hands to make and break connections.

Ball Lock QDs- If you've been around air compressors or ball lock style corny kegs, you already have an idea of how these work. Like camlocks, the male part has a groove that is engaged by the female coupling but instead of a cam arm, it's locked with a series of ball bearings. They are also built with stainless steel and silicone. The major advantage to these is the ease of operation, only requiring one hand. There are a couple downsides including cost and lack of cross-vendor compatibility. On the bright side, we are the first and only vendor to sell these in a high flow "plus" sized hose barbs.
 
My spidey senses were tingling.

Yes indeed vendors are ramping up their offerings with TC ports but this is really and chicken or egg philosophical question. Are they doing TC ports because they are inherently better for a 10 gallon homebrew pot or because people are just buying them because the big brewers do it and they want to be cool?

I have to be careful that I don't piss off some manufacturers that I don't want to piss off but let's just say that I find a 10 gallon kettle with full size TC butterfly valves all over the place to be the equivalent of 24" spinner wheels on a Honda Civic. That's not a compliment by the way.

I recorded this overview video 3 years ago but I still stand by everything I said in it. The video covers a lot more than disconnects but this link will take you to about the 13 minute mark where I talk about hose/QD connections: VIDEO

 
My spidey senses were tingling.

Yes indeed vendors are ramping up their offerings with TC ports but this is really and chicken or egg philosophical question. Are they doing TC ports because they are inherently better for a 10 gallon homebrew pot or because people are just buying them because the big brewers do it and they want to be cool?

I have to be careful that I don't piss off some manufacturers that I don't want to piss off but let's just say that I find a 10 gallon kettle with full size TC butterfly valves all over the place to be the equivalent of 24" spinner wheels on a Honda Civic. That's not a compliment by the way.

I recorded this overview video 3 years ago but I still stand by everything I said in it. The video covers a lot more than disconnects but this link will take you to about the 13 minute mark where I talk about hose/QD connections: VIDEO



Wow very cool. I'll check it out!
 
I have experience with all three types of fittings. I use QD's on my eBIAB indoor system. I have a 3 vessel system that uses Tri Clamps. I also brew with friends that use Camlocks on their 3 vessel system.

All three have their quirks...

QD's can be operated one handed but when you have hot wort running through them you have to use gloves which makes attaching a hose cumbersome since it seems the glove gets caught between the male and female end most of the time.

Tri Clamps are pretty straight forward but it takes practice to position the clamp so the tightening nut is not in the way of valves etc. There are also separate parts such as the gasket and clamp part so you have to be organized so you are not losing gaskets etc.

Camlocks drive me crazy, but I'm in the minority with my brewing friends who love them. I have the least experience with them but it just seems counter intuitive that the arms have to be forward before inserting the female end into the male end. My friend who runs the rig the most does it in his sleep. One advantage of Camlocks is they are usually the cheapest option. My friend uses them everywhere in his brewery. Garden hose fittings make it easy to attach to the chiller or rinse out pumps etc.

The one thing I can say is that all three work well for quickly disconnecting hoses, don't leak etc. All are easy to keep clean and since this is the hot side of the brewery you don't have to worry about them being completely sanitary.
 
My NPT style ball valves always get gunk around the ball that needs cleaning every 3 brewers or so while the tri-clamp valves only need cleaning once a year.
 
My NPT style ball valves always get gunk around the ball that needs cleaning every 3 brewers or so while the tri-clamp valves only need cleaning once a year.
Mine used to get gunk in them too. I hit the easy button on this. My set-up is fairly simple, but my gunk-free method can work for anybody. After the cleaning is done I run hot water through my system to rinse out the CF chiller, pump, and hoses for 5 -10 minutes. After my rinsing is done, I drain as much of the water as I can. As I disconnect the hoses, there is still some water in the lines so I have an old extract bucket I use to catch the water and then put the business end of the hose in. As I go by, I disconnect, catch water, drop fitting end in. By the time all of my hoses are disconnected, the fittings are in the bucket submerged in hot water. I leave them here while I finish cleaning up.

Since doing this I have not had one gunked up connection. The only caveat is you have to have the female fitting on all your hoses.
 
I've been using camlocks for years based on @Bobby_M 's video and have been very happy with them. Then I got a conical with all tri-clamp. After that a Stout counterflow chiller which is also tri-clamp. So now I've got a bit of a mix. As far as I can tell I've never had sanitation issues that could be linked to my hot side ball valves and cam locks and they are cheaper and easier to use than tri-clamps.
 
I’m currently starting a 20 gallon kettle build where I want to install a TC port for my element but I have cam locks for all of my hoses. I haven’t had an issue with any of the cam locks, I think they’re great and easy to clean and something about them that’s so satisfying when you lock them in.
 
Mine used to get gunk in them too. I hit the easy button on this. My set-up is fairly simple, but my gunk-free method can work for anybody.
"Crud" that I'm talking about gets behind the gasket and around the ball on the valve. I haven't had success cleaning this with a PBW or acid recirculation, every once in a while I just need to pull the NPT valves.

2015-11-21 14.19.16.jpg
 
To easily clean ball valves and remove that crud, try these: 1/2" NPT Quick Clean Ball Valve from Brewers Hardware They come in a variety of configurations.
Ball Valve 2.jpg

After three infections I traced to my brew kettle ball valve, I bought one of these and added a camlock fitting to the end. When I clean my brew kettle, it is easy to quickly disassemble, clean and reassemble the ball valve.
 
"Crud" that I'm talking about gets behind the gasket and around the ball on the valve. I haven't had success cleaning this with a PBW or acid recirculation, every once in a while I just need to pull the NPT valves.

View attachment 707101

Don't forget that in order for a CIP process to work on the valves is that they have to be put in the half closed position to allow flow behind the seats. Actually, the best is when you occasionally cycle the valves open and closed because it surges flow in.
 
Don't forget that in order for a CIP process to work on the valves is that they have to be put in the half closed position to allow flow behind the seats. Actually, the best is when you occasionally cycle the valves open and closed because it surges flow in.

Yea, I would open close, reverse flow etcetera. Not a big deal to pull them apart every month or so, but if I did it again I would use triclamps on the brew kettle and on the heating elements.
 
Yea, I would open close, reverse flow etcetera. Not a big deal to pull them apart every month or so, but if I did it again I would use triclamps on the brew kettle and on the heating elements.
By tri clamps you mean sanitary butterfy valves right? because there is a difference.. Ive used plenty of triclamp ended ball valves which are just as non sanitary as any other ball valve. There are exceptions to the rule but personally I think splurging for sanitary triclamps and then still using ball valves defeats the purpose of the triclamps being sanitary.. Having said that I use all sorts of 3 way and 2 way ball valves in my home brewing setup with cip and actuate then while cleaning.. I agree they still have to be pulled apart from time to time and have the ball removed to clean properly in most cases.
 
By tri clamps you mean sanitary butterfy valves right?
Yes that is what I meant.
There are exceptions to the rule but personally I think splurging for sanitary triclamps and then still using ball valves defeats the purpose of the triclamps being sanitary
I wouldn't go through the effort of using triclamps on a ball valve either.

They don't have to be cleaned enough that I've done anything about them.... but if I was building again I would use triclamp butterflies on just the boil kettle. As well as tri clamps on both heating elements.
 
Let Me put it this way... I cleaned mine by actuating the ball valves back and forth while pumping hot pbw through and I didnt take mine apart for about 3 years... when I finally did I realized how disgusting it still got inside behind the ball.
 
I have an all tri-clamp setup. I bought it because there seemed to be a consensus that it was the most sanitary, and my initial plan was to set the system up to clean in place.

I am beginning to wonder whether I made a mistake. I've determined that the tri-clamp configurations on most homebrew gear is almost certainly going to have to be fully disassembled to get a proper cleaning (more on my reasoning below) and if you are going to fully disassemble and clean everything at the end of each brew anyway, why not use connectors that are easy to connect and disconnect (I've learned from experience that installing tri-clamps from kettle containing boiling hot wort with some in the hoses in mid brew to switch the connection to another port is not much fun :D ).

The reason I claim you can't effectively clean in place with these systems:
Most of the kettles, mash tuns, conicals, Unitanks, etc. that I see for homebrew come with 1.5" TC flanges, but often have a pipe coming into that flange with an I.D. smaller than 1.5". Picture what the inside of 1.5" TC connection looks like when you have 2 x 1.5" i.d. pipes. The inside wall of the first pipe is flush to the inside edge of the TC gasket which is in turn flush with the inside wall of the next pipe in line. However, when you have two fittings, each with, say, an i.d. of < .5" connected to a 1.5" flange coming together, you end up with a disk shaped "dead space" between the inside edge of the gasket and the i.d. of tubes coming into the flange. I have done hour long CIP cycles and then disassembled these connections, only to discover trub / hops debris inside of these dead spaces. Since the majority of my 1.5" TC connections have at least one of the fittings <1.5", I now disassemble everything after each brew day.
 
I dunno if I understand your dead space issue, can you post a pic of the area where you find debris? From a sanitation standpoint, TC fittings are better than threaded fittings, and on the hot side a bit of residue isn't a big concern. I do kinda feel like TC doesn't make as much sense below 2" diameter. My stuff is all either 4 inch or 2 inch, smaller fittings are hoses with camlocks.
 
Actually, in looking for a picture online to illustrate my problem, I may had solved my problem :D It could be I have been using the wrong gaskets for these connections.

Here is a picture of a cross section of a 1.5" TC connection between two pipes which are both 1.5" i.d.:
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1...tical-labeled-300x214.jpg?9838923691070030112
And here is a picture of a TC connection where the o.d. is larger than the i.d.:
https://www.glaciertanks.com/site_templates/Custom/img/TC_Flange_to_Tube.png
You can see in the second example they are using a special gasket with a smaller ID to fill what would otherwise be a gap left between the two faces of the flanges, if a standard gasket was used.

So I guess the solution for me would be to buy a bunch of something like these to use on my system:
https://www.crafthardware.de/en/product/epdm-gasket-tri-clamp-1-5-id-16-mm/
 
My kettles are all 1-1/2" TC connections now (moved away form the QD's) including manifolds for the pumps. I take the fittings off the MT once the grain has been removed, to clean it (makes it easier to do a complete clean). I do the same with the BK once it's drained. All the connections into the kettles are 5/8" OD tubing (so full 1/2" ID). The 'gap' between the valve and those is small. So really not much space for things to hang out.

I don't use a CIP ball in my kettles. I do use one for the conical fermenters. Those I empty, rinse, then run hot PBW through to clean. Then allow it to soak for some time before doing a complete rinse and then sanitize.

I don't have items large enough to warrant using 4" TC fittings. The only 2" TC fittings are on the conical dump ports. Everything else is using 1-1/2" TC fittings. With everything TIG welded in place (ferrules to kettles/fermenters) they are very easy to clean. IME, the butterfly valves are also a snap to clean (far easier than NPT ball valves). Even the TC ball valves I have (have a clamp to make take-apart/cleaning easy) are no issue to get clean. I have one ball valve on the O2 infusion setup for the wort out port on the plate chiller. I sometimes use another on the MT inlet port (from the HERMS coil).

BTW, I grew to hate cam lock QDs. After enough times using the ball lock QDs, I had enough of those too. Moved to the TC barbed fittings and created the manifolds for the pumps and now my brew days are far easier. Simply open valves in the path the liquid needs to flow and let it ride. No more changing connections between items. Makes for less mess at the end of things too.
 
In my limited, cold side tri clamp life, only the butterfly valves are full bore. To avoid disassembly, all other connections would need various custom-ID gaskets.

Hot side seems simpler with quick disconnects - camlocks in my case. But you're stuck with TC, @Henesy. They're harder to connect and disconnect but not awful. And they *are * the most sanitary if you disassemble them. You will probably get used to them. Don't fret. Maybe show us a pic of your awesome all-TC rig?
 
I don't have great pictures of the rig, but here are some from my next to last brew day:

https://photos.app.goo.gl/EUc6aVJ3UuriLWqD6
I've since upgraded to an electric HLT. (Hybrid rig using gas for the kettle and PID controlled electric HLT w/ HERMs coil)

https://photos.app.goo.gl/j3Lwi9GSswp8jQSbA
I'll try to get better pictures on the next brew day. Getting ready to brew a peach and habanero flavored Berliner Weiss for the spring.
 
Actually, in looking for a picture online to illustrate my problem, I may had solved my problem :D It could be I have been using the wrong gaskets for these connections.

Here is a picture of a cross section of a 1.5" TC connection between two pipes which are both 1.5" i.d.:
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1...tical-labeled-300x214.jpg?9838923691070030112
And here is a picture of a TC connection where the o.d. is larger than the i.d.:
https://www.glaciertanks.com/site_templates/Custom/img/TC_Flange_to_Tube.png
You can see in the second example they are using a special gasket with a smaller ID to fill what would otherwise be a gap left between the two faces of the flanges, if a standard gasket was used.

So I guess the solution for me would be to buy a bunch of something like these to use on my system:
https://www.crafthardware.de/en/product/epdm-gasket-tri-clamp-1-5-id-16-mm/
The correct way to connect is to size the gasket opening to the direction of flow. If the flow is towards the 1/2 opening fitting it gets 1/2 gasket. But if the flow is towards the1” fitting you use the 1” gasket. Doing it backwards against the flow will cause the inner lip of the gasket to bend away from the fitting, creating the gap where debris gets stuck. No bueno. Note that if you do cip with a “Reverse” flow /back flush you will cause this issue.
 
IME, getting the TC clamps aligned for easy use of valves is pretty easy (once you think about it, or do it a couple of times). I use the full size gaskets pretty much everywhere in my system now. Less things to deal with, or think about. As I mentioned, when I'm cleaning out the MT and BK, I remove all the items connected to them. It's easy to do (IME) and makes sure nothing is trapped that could create issues.

Once my new plate chiller is in position, I'm thinking about labeling the lines to make it easier to strip everything down and reconnect after. I'm waiting to get the new chiller in place because the wort filter is getting moved slightly. Which means I'll either switch that hose from another, or make a new one for that connection (manifold to filter). I'm hoping that the hose I've been using for the filter to chiller can be used moving forward.

While this isn't a cheap option (so not something many will do) having manifolds on both pump heads has made my brew day significantly easier on me. I got the idea after a post by Jaybird, and built it up. IIRC, it ended costing me about $500 to build, with having some of the items already. Might have been a bit more (under $600, I think) by the time I was done. Instead of needing to change hose connections during the brewing process, I simply open/close valves. It helps that my entire setup uses TC connections, including the pump heads. Which means they won't shift during use. It's also easy to be 100% sure you're not going to have a leak, or a connection drop during use. I use all 5/8" OD barbs with 1/2" ID hose sizes, for clamp free connections (hose to barb). With the new plate chiller having all TC connections, I'm ready there too since I have garden hose to TC fittings. I'm hoping to get the new chiller mount made this weekend.
 
I'm going to make the jump to TC, but not because the pros do it or that it looks cool (ok, it DOES look cool). I've just grown to really hate camlocks and truth be told, 3pc ball valves to me suck. I freaking hate breaking them down to clean them. The TC connections on my conicals make me hate them even more because it's nothing to break those down to clean. Some of my cam locks I can connect one handed, and the others make me feel I need to go into a gamma ray induced rage to get these damn things to close. So I'm going to give the ball lock disconnects a shot.

Two of my friends in my brew club are going to buy my kettles. Truth be told, I really didn't want to sell them, but after talking to Spike, modifying my v3 kettles from NPT to TC isn't an option they offer. Bummer. So, I plan on replacing these with the v4+. I've already got the TC EZ cleanball valves from Bobby M. Now the only thing threaded is the ball valve on my homemade mash tun, but it's still going to be an EZ clean, so much better to break down vs a 3pc valve.
 
@Yesfan I'd go direct to the barb TC connections and not go to the ball lock types if I was to make my Spike kettle purchase again (I have the v4 line). Since I have a box of those now that are sitting unused. While the thought behind the ball lock is good, execution (for me) wasn't nearly as good. If you're looking at doing the QDs for changing connections during the brew day, give serious though to making manifolds for the pumps. I've posted pictures of mine in the past. If you want to talk more about that, shoot me a PM and we can go over all of it. If you're still dead set on doing QDs, I'd still look at doing the manifold. Just means you won't need to disconnect lines while brewing.
 
On another note about 3pc ball valves. What I liked about Spike's NPT ball valves are they have male threads on the end that connects to the kettle, so they just screw into the port. I like that. No male nipple to connect the female ends of the port and valve.

Unfortunately with the EZ clean valves, you either get female NPT on both ends or TC. What would be cool would be if the output of those valves were different. If you're using cam locks, just get the valve that has the built in camlock output. Then your hose connects directly to the valve. No male cam lock to screw into the valve or a cam x TC fitting fitting between the hose and valve. @Bobby_M @Jaybird @SpikeBrewing is that possible?
 
@Yesfan I'd go direct to the barb TC connections and not go to the ball lock types if I was to make my Spike kettle purchase again (I have the v4 line). Since I have a box of those now that are sitting unused. While the thought behind the ball lock is good, execution (for me) wasn't nearly as good. If you're looking at doing the QDs for changing connections during the brew day, give serious though to making manifolds for the pumps. I've posted pictures of mine in the past. If you want to talk more about that, shoot me a PM and we can go over all of it. If you're still dead set on doing QDs, I'd still look at doing the manifold. Just means you won't need to disconnect lines while brewing.

Can you post a pic of your manifold? I have a Top Tier. Nothing elaborate like some of the setups I've seen here. I gravity feed from the HLT (direct fired) for my mash water and sparging. My mashtun is a cooler, so the most changes I'm doing is the one hose when transferring the wort from MT to the BK.
 
On another note about 3pc ball valves. What I liked about Spike's NPT ball valves are they have male threads on the end that connects to the kettle, so they just screw into the port. I like that. No male nipple to connect the female ends of the port and valve.

Unfortunately with the EZ clean valves, you either get female NPT on both ends or TC. What would be cool would be if the output of those valves were different. If you're using cam locks, just get the valve that has the built in camlock output. Then your hose connects directly to the valve. No male cam lock to screw into the valve or a cam x TC fitting fitting between the hose and valve. @Bobby_M @Jaybird @SpikeBrewing is that possible?
IMO, doing hard/dedicated fitting types on the valves, like that, wouldn't make sense. For one thing, with either NPT or TC connections on the valves, YOU can use whatever you want on them. Having a QD, or barb, connection part of the valve means more items to stock, get from suppliers, and other logistical headaches that will drive up the costs and down the supply.

IME, all TC connections (like the Spike+ kettles) means YOU get to put whatever you want onto them from that point. I'm actually GLAD I did that since I've gone from the QD (ball lock style) to all barb fittings since getting the kettles. IF I had to replace all the valves as well, that would have both driven the cost of that change up (by not a small amount) AND I'd have even MORE things hanging around unused.
 
IMO, doing hard/dedicated fitting types on the valves, like that, wouldn't make sense. For one thing, with either NPT or TC connections on the valves, YOU can use whatever you want on them. Having a QD, or barb, connection part of the valve means more items to stock, get from suppliers, and other logistical headaches that will drive up the costs and down the supply.

IME, all TC connections (like the Spike+ kettles) means YOU get to put whatever you want onto them from that point. I'm actually GLAD I did that since I've gone from the QD (ball lock style) to all barb fittings since getting the kettles. IF I had to replace all the valves as well, that would have both driven the cost of that change up (by not a small amount) AND I'd have even MORE things hanging around unused.

Makes sense. Maybe I'm over thinking it. I was thinking, again using the EZ clean valve as an example, the out-put would be universal. So instead of buying a standard butterfly or ball valve and having to install either a camlock, quick connect, barb, fitting for the hose to connect, you just get the valve out put end needed.
 
So I'm looking to build a keggle here pretty soon. I've seen a lot of tutorials and all the parts. But I'm also noticing all the higher end brew kettles (ss brewtech, spike+ etc) all use tri clamp set ups instead of regular nozzles.

I've spent a few days working in local breweries and I won't like the ease of tri clamp is pretty handy so if I could incorporate that in my brewing I'd love too.

I was curious how I would even find the ports and parts to make my keggle tri clamp and if it would even be worth it.
Here's the lowdown.. Tri-clamps are a pain in the ass to use until you get the hang of it. But, the Tr-clamps are 5 times better than butterfly valves (and less expensive) and 10 times better than screw-on connectors. The Tri-clamps are faster, more secure, less likely to leak, and a whole lot easier to sanitize because of the lack of threads. It is worth it? I would say absolutely.
 
line. However, when you have two fittings, each with, say, an i.d. of < .5" connected to a 1.5" flange coming together, you end up with a disk shaped "dead space" between the inside edge of the gasket and the i.d. of tubes coming into the flange.

To be fair, the stated benefits of TC connections on tanks/vessels is that it can easily be broken down for cleaning, not that it's CIP'able.
 
Back
Top