Not quite sure why that makes the people doing the hiring idiots? I have certain criteria that needs to be met, and if you can't meet that criteria, why should I hire you? (not necessarily you specifically
![Smile :) :)]()
I'm referring to the royal you)
As far as drug testing? Well, that's pretty damn simple. If you have drugs in your system, I will not hire you. Period. Don't really care if my Federal contracts dictate that or not. Liability associated with having someone on drugs on one of my projects, or in one of my vehicles, or even in my office is astounding.
Background check. Again, pretty simple. If you are a convicted felon due to...oh, I don't know, aggravated murder and you just got out of jail? You will not work for me. Now, if you have a felony for stealing someone's credit card number, made restitution and did your 'time' (whatever that may be), from back when you were 18 and had an overzealous prosecutor trying to make a name for himself and you are now 43? Well, ok, let's see what you've done/not done since. Regardless, to me background check results are subjective and sometimes are dependant on what kind of vibe I got from you in my interview process.
Bottom line is, I'm not seeing an issue with any of the things you have mentioned. (ok, with the exception of the 2 months. That's ridiculous. I can have all my ducks in a row in less than 72 hours and make my decision final pending the outcome of the above mentioned checks even before then). Sounds like responsible hiring practices, looking for people that are responsible adults. Not large children with long legs.