The [Horribly Unpopular] Soccer Thread

HomeBrewTalk.com - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Community.

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

bkboiler

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2015
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
493
Location
San Diego
The customer never decides which product to produce, at which price to sell etc. The customer never was the boss. Nor the fan. The shareholder is he who puts the money. He should be the boss, but isn't. The boss is UEFA. UEFA doesn't put the capital, doesn't make the work, but makes all decisions.
agreed, clubs were very out of touch to think the customer wanted this...or knew what the customer wanted but didn't care.
Knew that UEFA or FIFA wouldn't approve, but didn't care.
Reminds me of a quote from the movie Judge Dredd, "I AM THE LAW!"
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
3,291
Reaction score
3,279
The customer never decides which product to produce, at which price to sell etc. The customer never was the boss. Nor the fan. The shareholder is he who puts the money. He should be the boss, but isn't. The boss is UEFA. UEFA doesn't put the capital, doesn't make the work, but makes all decisions.
I learned business differently Birro...
The first responsibility of a business is to its shareholders (or owners). If no one owns the business, there is no business. If my $1000 in the bank earns 2.75%, maybe I'll buy a share of X Corp that might bring 4.75%. If it brings me 0, I will dump it. If I think it will bring me 15% in both good times and bad, I have probably been drinking too much of my own beer,
The second responsibility of a business is to its customers. Give them a good product at the right price or shutter the place. If there is no revenue, there is no business.
The third responsibility is to employees and staff. Get the best you can at the price you can afford. Don't hire Modric if you can't afford Modric. But hire the right marketing person and maybe next year revenue will increase.

My point is that your customers maybe sort of kind of would buy or not buy Super League, but they do indeed buy a chance at the league championship and Champions league entry. So thats' what you sell to honor your first and third obligations. Without fans, you have nothing.
 

Birrofilo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
592
Reaction score
300
Location
Rome
@soccerdad

A firm produces a product because they think there is a market for the product. There is no responsibility for customers whatsoever. You can build bicycles, and then you decide to move into cars. You can ditch the bicycle business and concentrate on cars. The fact that your customers say "hey I liked your bicycles" doesn't matter to the business. The Scuderia Ferrari might abandon Formula 1 tomorrow and concentrate on endurance races and the fans would have no part in this. (Both are not "sports" if we have to believe the recent ideas expressed by many, not to mention Formula E). Or could create, with other teams, a separate championship and it would be normal. Fans wouldn't object.

Remember all those football clubs were born without fans. When they became businesses, the thing that matter is selling the product, overall. Fans are not special, in this respect, they give no more than distant Chinese TV viewers. They are all customers. If they want to see the show, they pay. If they don't want, they don't pay. It's easy and it has always been this way. You get no right of vote because you go to the stadium.

A firm does what is in their interest. Good post-sale service is in the interest of the firm because it builds reputation, not for moral reasons. Fidelity to a style of beer is in the interest of the brewery because it exploits the reputation of the beer, not because beer enthusiasts like it. The bottom line is what matters.

A few hundreds fans, probably belonging to the scum of the bleachers (the "Vikings" in the case of Juventus), never had the possibility to change clubs' decisions. Those clubs are in troubled waters, Covid created huge holes in their accounts. Fans don't realize that Clubs do go bankrupt. Money made them change decisions much more likely. Tottenham was among the firmest supporters of the project, and changed their mind in half an hour.

In any case, truth be told, it's not important for those Clubs if they lose 10% of the supporters, who wake up one morning and discover that this is professional sport. For the Clubs the important is that they get the money by selling the product all over the world.

@bkboiler

What FIFA and UEFA think has nothing to do with Clubs decisions. FIFA and UEFA do not own Clubs.
 

Qhrumphf

Stay Rude, Stay Rebel, Stay SHARP
Lifetime Supporter
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
16,418
Reaction score
5,948
Location
Arlington (DC)
Business owners matter in the same sense that money matters- only because we think they do and an authority that tries to enforce it. Its not who "puts the money" who really matters. It's who puts the *labor*. As with all businesses, what the owner wants means f*** all the instant the employees withhold labor. The club owner is nothing without the players and staff. And then the fans/customers secondary to that. Those two factors are perfectly capable of running the club without the owner. Owners power is solely by fiat (just as money is). They're fundamentally parasites.

And then, in the case of football, players ultimately come and go. Owners can just go. Let the fans dictate the direction of the clubs, 100%.

I don't care at all for what some billionaire thinks he can make off of a club older than his grandfather. Football belongs to the people.

In my ideal world, at least.

(Perhaps at this point you've got me sussed as a St. Pauli supporter as well lol)
 

Birrofilo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
592
Reaction score
300
Location
Rome
@Qhrumphf

I don't want to enter into this economic-political-philosophical discussion of the relationship between capital and labour. Many wars have been fought for that.

Let's say that what you call the "parasites" risk the billions, and what you call the "employees", in this football world, earn scandalous salaries and bear no risk (if we except the bankruptcy of the "parasite", but they will find another contract).

In all this, I don't see how the fans should decide anything.

Football doesn't belong to people at all.

As a Juventus fan, I understand I have no weight in any decision, nor should I have it. I love the colours. I trust the captain of the ship, which is not my ship just because I love it.
 

Nubiwan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
505
Reaction score
265
Whats made me laugh in all this ESL hyperbole, is that football, in its present state, was somehow worth defending. What a crock. My immediate reaction to the ESL announcement was, "who really gives a toss?" Game is so far removed from your average joe, its not funny.

I mean, i was born in Liverpool, and lived there till the 80s. Even while living there, it was pretty extravagant to go to the match, in terms of ticket cost, but it was affordable. My club was essentially made up of British lads, with a smattering of foreign talent, maybe 2-3 non Brits in the squad. All league games kicked off at 3 every saturday. Might have been a midweek european match, or cup replay. 42 games a season, and up to 50-60 if you remained in decent cup runs. FA cup was a prestigious trophy, and if you won it, youd be heralded as one of the best teams in the land. Rightly or wrongly.

Today, liverpool might kick off on saturday just 3-4 times a year. Hardly ever at 3 pm. No one gives a crap about the fa cup and league cup. Liverpool have 3-4 brits in their squad, a foreign manager, and ownership. Television rights demand they play at a unique hour, so that their commericial worldwide support can be optimized. You cant get into matches simply by walking up to the ground. You have to be a registered fan. Sit in your seat. Take selfies all day with out of town fans, who can afford executive class ticket packages, buy one of 4 team shirts that change each month, and essentially soften much of the boisterous atmosphere in the ground.

The perception of many footy fans today, that of the media covering it, and the EPL promotes, is that football actually started in 1992. Everything we talk about is EPL records this that and the other. As if Jimmy Greaves never existed with his 350 plus league goals. Alan Shearer holds the scoring record in many young kids eyes.

How has the EPL been good for developing even British football, when it is more a showcase for foreign lads who taught us all to cheat and dive around? Today, cheating is an accepted component of the game. There is no respect, sportsmanship, despite what the armbands say. It is not that it is wrong to have foreign content grace the game either, but what other country has allowed it to overtake their game, to such an extent. "English" premier league - a supposed national sport - is only that because of geography. Not content.

Im pretty sure my club has been no beacon of light for English football, and the truth is, most local Liverpool fans have little in common with the club they support, despite their fervour for the club, and how the recent ESL debacle transpired. Football is money is football. Been that way for 30 years. Its up for sale to the highest bidder. Chelsea bough some of it, and now its Man City's turn. PSG? I mean, the french may have won the world cup, but their league is a joke. Spanish league? 2 horsed race with both front runners mired in massive debt. FIFA, EUFa etc, are a bunch of corrupt brown baggers, that see fit to run world cups in Dubai, and ignore obvious fair play shenanigans of money clubs like city and psg. Liverpool are not better than many.

The point of all the rambling is that football has already become a financial farce, and that we probably needed this sort of fan reaction when some joker came along and suggested the premier league in 1992, Instead, the game as we knew it was sold. In a nutshell, English football exists outside the premier league, in lower and local leagues. The top division is hollywood dross,
 
Last edited:

Birrofilo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
592
Reaction score
300
Location
Rome
The point of all the rambling is that football has already become a financial farce, and that we probably needed this sort of fan reaction when some joker came along and suggested the premier league in 1992, Instead, the game as we knew it was sold.
Actually, I think "this sort of reaction" happened exactly because the fans do not understand that football "has already become a financial farce". People reacted as if we were in the 1970'.

I don't think it's a farce, it is sport-businss, not unlike cyclism, or Formula 1, which underwent this kind of evolution many years ago. Teams are not "natonal", and in the case of Formula 1 seats are mostly very expensive (unless you stay 2 hours standing in muddy grass under the rain).

It is not any more the football of when I was a child, either. Times change, but all change is driven by demand, there is no conspiracy. When I was a child, all teams played at the same time. We listened the matches at the radio, and we might have bet with the Totocalcio, the only allowed footbal betting game of the time.

But people wanted to see the matches at the TV, and they wanted to see all important matches. And a lot of people like to make small bets on football matches. One of the consequences is that the horse-racing industry nearly died in Italy. Times change, but it's the result of demand.
 

Nubiwan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
505
Reaction score
265
Actually, I think "this sort of reaction" happened exactly because the fans do not understand that football "has already become a financial farce". People reacted as if we were in the 1970'.

I don't think it's a farce, it is sport-businss, not unlike cyclism, or Formula 1, which underwent this kind of evolution many years ago. Teams are not "natonal", and in the case of Formula 1 seats are mostly very expensive (unless you stay 2 hours standing in muddy grass under the rain).

It is not any more the football of when I was a child, either. Times change, but all change is driven by demand, there is no conspiracy. When I was a child, all teams played at the same time. We listened the matches at the radio, and we might have bet with the Totocalcio, the only allowed footbal betting game of the time.

But people wanted to see the matches at the TV, and they wanted to see all important matches. And a lot of people like to make small bets on football matches. One of the consequences is that the horse-racing industry nearly died in Italy. Times change, but it's the result of demand.
Not takling about F1 or cyclng which few people care about compared to football. Those sports lend themselves to the remote viewer. Football is very much more local. The local fan has been squeezed out of football. All in the name of this demand your seem to think exists, or makes it somehow better. The demand comes from people not even associated with clubs they support. Armchair fans. This football era hasnt improved the sport.

Football is a farce among world sports. People laugh at the antics of football players and sporting bodies alike. Yeah, sure it commands financial respect, but demand has not made it better to watch. Cheating players acting like fairies when they get a knock, playing for financial cheating clubs. Corrupt organizations that run the sporting bodies.

Football it there to be bought by the highest bidder. Chelsea - PSG - Man City - Real - Barcelona? None of thees clubs able to bank role their players through normal avenues, yet allowed to do as they please. A world cup hosted in Dubai! Pleases. Its a joke. Show me the improvement above and beyond a wider televison audience, and more money? More corruption.

Nothing good about the state of football. I frankly do not care. I have nothing in common with my home town team, and watch mor out of fleeting interest. I actually pay closer attention to F1 ironically.
 

Birrofilo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
592
Reaction score
300
Location
Rome
Not takling about F1 or cyclng which few people care about compared to football. Those sports lend themselves to the remote viewer. Football is very much more local.
[...]
I actually pay closer attention to F1 ironically.
In Italy cycling is the second most practised sport (at all levels) and is probably the second most viewed sport in television. It's a national passion second only to football. And yet, since the mist of times, the most important competitions are private tournaments.

I don't understand why you see F1 as a "cleaner" sport (or sport-business) than football. There is all sort of cheating even there, and "referees" can heavily influence a result (even more after the introduction of the "pace car"). Second pilots are often chosen for the sponsor they bring, or the TV public they bring, not for merit. F1 races are organized in the Arabic peninsula (Bahrein, and possibly also Qatar in the future) as well, and nobody complains about labour exploitation. You cannot normally go and see it, it's for rich people. And there is no second league to be relegated to. And it's not local at all. It really is like the Superleague.

But football was different when we were children, so that we don't recognize it any more, while F1 was this way since its inception (and actually before, talking about that kind of competitions) so it is considered "normal".

Local football can be followed regardless of what happens in professional football.
 

Nubiwan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
505
Reaction score
265
In Italy cycling is the second most practised sport (at all levels) and is probably the second most viewed sport in television. It's a national passion second only to football. And yet, since the mist of times, the most important competitions are private tournaments.

I don't understand why you see F1 as a "cleaner" sport (or sport-business) than football. There is all sort of cheating even there, and "referees" can heavily influence a result (even more after the introduction of the "pace car"). Second pilots are often chosen for the sponsor they bring, or the TV public they bring, not for merit. F1 races are organized in the Arabic peninsula (Bahrein, and possibly also Qatar in the future) as well, and nobody complains about labour exploitation. You cannot normally go and see it, it's for rich people. And there is no second league to be relegated to. And it's not local at all. It really is like the Superleague.

But football was different when we were children, so that we don't recognize it any more, while F1 was this way since its inception (and actually before, talking about that kind of competitions) so it is considered "normal".

Local football can be followed regardless of what happens in professional football.
I never ever said F1 was clean. Merely that i am more compelled to watch that product, than the game i loved as a boy. F1 has always been the purview of the rich and famous. Monaco etc. as you said. Hence the irony. There is no deceipt attempted in F1. It is what it is. I think football tries to pretend its still there for the people. Its not. Its a corrupt money racquet, for sale to the highest bidder. Brown bag enterprise.

I think any sport activity, at grass roots can be more compelling than at the professional level. See college football in the us versus the NFL offering. It is still nice to see professionals do it at high pace, and with skill. Ice hockey being a fine example of both grass roots excitment, and the professional game being fast and highly skilled, for anyoen ever skated, or tried to play it. Football loses something at the professional level at times, and the entire scope of the financial direction it has taken has left a fair few people disenchanted, i would suggest. Enough is enough for many.
 
Last edited:

bkboiler

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2015
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
493
Location
San Diego
I'm an armchair fan, I support the San Marino national team...
Just kidding.
Across all sport types and levels, competitions are segregated by ability and governed to limit arms-races. F1 is a perfect example. Physics does not necessarily limit the car's ability as much as the regulations do.
As long as teams with the financial means such as Manchester United are allowed to compete in the same league as Sheffield (for example), you'll have an unsporting exhibition.
Unfortunately for the love of the game...it's further regulation that brings teams such as this onto an equal playing field and prevents the board rooms from deciding the match rather than the locker rooms.
 

Nubiwan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
505
Reaction score
265
Actually, I think "this sort of reaction" happened exactly because the fans do not understand that football "has already become a financial farce". People reacted as if we were in the 1970'.

I don't think it's a farce, it is sport-businss, not unlike cyclism, or Formula 1, which underwent this kind of evolution many years ago. Teams are not "natonal", and in the case of Formula 1 seats are mostly very expensive (unless you stay 2 hours standing in muddy grass under the rain).

It is not any more the football of when I was a child, either. Times change, but all change is driven by demand, there is no conspiracy. When I was a child, all teams played at the same time. We listened the matches at the radio, and we might have bet with the Totocalcio, the only allowed footbal betting game of the time.

But people wanted to see the matches at the TV, and they wanted to see all important matches. And a lot of people like to make small bets on football matches. One of the consequences is that the horse-racing industry nearly died in Italy. Times change, but it's the result of demand.
@Birrofilo just curious what percentage of Series A team's players are Italian. Id be betting it is a higher proportion of those who are English in the "English" equivalent. Same if i asked a Spaniard, German or Frenchman.

I looked it up....... EPL is 36 % English. Serie A 39% Italian. France, Germany and Spain all hover around 50% home talent. Which countries are the most successful in recent years?

The premier league is all about money, yet somehow pretends its promoting football, for England. Does nothing good for English football.
 
Last edited:

Birrofilo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
592
Reaction score
300
Location
Rome
@Nubiwan

True. When I was a boy I followed Formula 1 very keenly. It goes without saying, my colours were uniform red. Well, at that time, basically the only Italian top person in the team was the chief engineer Forghieri. Later, not even that. Not one pilot, not the chief engineer. There was a very brief parenthesis with pilot Alboreto, and then again other 20-30 years of foreign drivers and engineers. Since last year there is an Italian chief engineer again, Binotto. I think the last Italian pilot was Alboreto who was in Ferrari in 1984 - 1988.

Yet, I do see Ferrari as an Italian team as I always did. Sport is not something entirely rational, and rooting for is even less rational.

Until recently, Juventus always had around 5/11 of players in the field who were Italians. Other teams, such as Inter and Milan - especially Inter - in certain cases had not one Italian player in the team, barring a youngster in the bleachers. Yet, I always continued to see it as an Italian team. Just like I see Manchester United as a British team.

When I was a child, there were no foreign players allowed. 100% of the teams were made of Italians.

Things change. I see football as the Formula 1 logic applied to the ball. Many things have changed since I was a child. "Rooting for" remains firm.
 
Top