• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Phil's Phalse Bottom - is it worth the $$$

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I've been using Phil's Phalse bottom in my cooler mash/Lauter tun for ten years and I've never had any problems with it. I get good efficiency with it so I'm sticking to what works.
 
Only a glutton for punishment would make his own false bottom. There are probably a thousand holes in one, evenly spaced. It would take hours. The Phalse Bottom is also nicely curved, which takes a mold and heat.
[/quote]

I don't doubt that the efficiency is better, but with my copper manifold set-up I got efficiencies of 71% - 73% so far and are happy with it. I just don't see why something that is not even SS has to cost $30.

Are the holes at least tapered towards the bottom of of the false bottom?

Kai
 
I don't doubt that the efficiency is better, but with my copper manifold set-up I got efficiencies of 71% - 73% so far and are happy with it. I just don't see why something that is not even SS has to cost $30.

]
On my firs batch with a phills bottom I had 78% efficiency, with a short SS braided line I would get 70-73%.
 
I use a length of braided s/s hose covering from Earl's( found at good part stores) and no problems at all, I think you could stand on it and it would still flow. a bit on the pricey side ,but like he said you get what you pay for.
 
I got the SS braid (it's a large diameter braid, 8-9 in. long) with the Bargain Fittings conversion kit I bought, and it's simple, easy to clean, an does a great job.
 
Back
Top