Three picks for Flacco, 41 yards on the ground for Ray Rice, story of the week is the mergence of Pats dominate D and Pats win by two TDs.
BOOK IT
BOOK IT
"ohhh. My Aunt Tilly grew up right near you on a horse farm in East Buttholeberg. We should totally get together and share some tea in Hillbillyville. Maybe we can rub each other's cheeseheads!"
Blaaaach
Three picks for Flacco, 41 yards on the ground for Ray Rice, story of the week is the mergence of Pats dominate D and Pats win by two TDs.
BOOK IT
also, Port Washington's on the map - ever watch Step by Step!??
yeah, thought so.
Suzanne Somers ftw
hahahaahhahahahahaha, I hope you don't get drug tested at work.
You're really not helping your case here.
Hey man. Not gonna effin happen. Trust me. It was NOT for freakin lack of effort. I beat every bush I could and I am just not jiggy with sitting in that stadium solo.
How bout a bet?
Loser has to travel to the winner's stadium next year and buy the winner a lap dance at the strip joint if the winners choice??
Let's go tough guy.
Pretty sure he's Polish but you know, a lot of bad **** happened in 1939.
Cape Brewing said:(disclaimer: I will delete that post if he was actually hurt. I heard he was just out)
Cards 3-0 for the first time in my life!
New England Patriots <---- going to absolutely freakin own everyone this year and if you don't think that's the case... you're stupid.
There.... now you know. :rockin:
How the **** is "wide right" not a reviewable play? I thought *every* scoring play was reviewable... Where's the logic in *not* allowing that to be reviewed? Sure, if it's a question of if the ball goes through the goalposts (which I've never once seen the officials **** up), that's reviewable... but in the situation where you would NEED a closer look - to determine if it went past an imaginary line - that's NOT reviewable? What's the logic in that?
Horribly officiated game, for both sides. The "unsportsmanlike" conduct on Harbaugh was bush-league at that point in the game, but they also threw a flag on McCourty for a complete phantom pass-interference play (not on the last drive, on the drive where Baltimore drove for the TD). I would *really* hope that a high-visibility game like this gets the regular officials back; this was a joke. They just didn't know what to call.
I have to say - Baltimore's crowd kind of sounds like a bunch of drunk soccer hooligans. I kind of wish Foxboro sounds like that more often.
How the **** is "wide right" not a reviewable play? I thought *every* scoring play was reviewable... Where's the logic in *not* allowing that to be reviewed? Sure, if it's a question of if the ball goes through the goalposts (which I've never once seen the officials **** up), that's reviewable... but in the situation where you would NEED a closer look - to determine if it went past an imaginary line - that's NOT reviewable? What's the logic in that?
Horribly officiated game, for both sides. The "unsportsmanlike" conduct on Harbaugh was bush-league at that point in the game, but they also threw a flag on McCourty for a complete phantom pass-interference play (not on the last drive, on the drive where Baltimore drove for the TD). I would *really* hope that a high-visibility game like this gets the regular officials back; this was a joke. They just didn't know what to call.
I have to say - Baltimore's crowd kind of sounds like a bunch of drunk soccer hooligans. I kind of wish Foxboro sounds like that more often.
Daaaaaaaaaaamn. Datrius Heyward-Bey got knnnnocked da FUG out!
Let's just say that McBrewski just used up the last Kleenex in his house.
So... would a 1-2 team be considered relevant?
I believe Baltimore won a CFL championship once
Belichick is an *******.
Enter your email address to join: