Got my new Intertaps.
2016-09-07_10-55-05 by
glamisduner, on Flickr
The perlick 630 growler filling feels like it fits perfectly! Chose this over the intertap version since it uses smaller tubing.
new intertap by
glamisduner, on Flickr
Got excited to try the stout attachment so I tossed it on my stout
Stout was at 12psi with 12 foot line, I was using my secondary regulator to carb up some IPA, and did not put the stout back on at a lower pressure. I got tons of foam out of the tap no matter what I set the flow control to, but thats probably due to the high carbonation.
Unfortunately my dry Stout Keg blew (of course it did I finally have a stout tap!), so I'll have to test again later. I guess I know what I am brewing next!
The quality seems pretty good, but they are much more beastly than my Perlick 525ss's, they are not quite as pretty but not bad either, and the pull off them is a bit scratchy in comparison (maybe they will wear in?) I got excited and just hooked the one up, should I lube some O-rings up?
As far as drips I have no comment yet, the stout tap was full of foam and dripped allot, I can say that they stick out farther than my perlicks especially with the stout nozzel, my drip tray was just barley catching the drips (but it still catches them).
I thought the flow control worked great, but I have 12 foot lines already, still nice to be able to slow down the flow a bit more
How can I tell if they are stainless? They are supposed to be stainless but the look plated to me, at least on the outside, the cast area looks like stainless though so they must be stainless right? They do attract a hard drive magnet, but so do my SS perlicks.
I took them apart and snapped a few more pics if anyone is interested in seeing them let me know.
All in all they seem nice, but not quite as nice as my perlicks in terms of quality. The perlicks are stainless and look like stainless, it almost looks like the Intertaps are chrome plated stainless to me which is weird. Almost like instead of polishing them they get them close enough then dip them in chrome...perlicks are certainly smoothed better before the final process, they are more refined in every way.
Some of the casting inside the intertap is not polished but raw cast right after the sealing mechanism, the polished part of the interior is not perlick smooth either, and since the anvil inside has to slide along the non-perfectly polished inside this create the slight bit of grind I was feeling.
Perlicks float inside so they operate very smooth.
The forward sealing mechanism might be better, but honestly I'm not fully convinced that it's a major improveent, and it does have it's downsides as well. There's allot more nylon parts in the intertap than my 525s (none) and the intertap bonnect seals at the top like the perlick 630 instead of on an oring on top of the bearing cup.
Not sure if this is better or worse but I read the 630's were a downgrade in this regard? Or is that how perlick fixed the leak problem, because I don't see much else as far as changes?
The perlick sulfer smell problem would still make me gravitate towards these for flow controls, even if they don't all suffer from it! (Who wants to gamble with their money? Why hasn't perlick fixed this!) I doubt the finish inside is really going to make a drastic difference, plus with these I can change the spout.
If you don't need to change spouts, or use the flow control, then I think the perlick 630's might be better. (MIGHT BE) they will at least look and operate smoother.