So given a 1725 rpm motor and a target of, say, 172 rpm at the mill shaft, that means the drive pulley circumference should be 1/10th the driven pulley.
Hard to tell from the pic perspective if those are in the ballpark...but they could be...
Cheers!
Thanks Day_tripper, I'll load it up with just enough to keep the belt going and not slipping.Holy cow! That thing could crush gravel now
But go as easy on the side-loading as possible in consideration of the brass bushings...
Cheers!
It’s coming along. However, maybe the 1/3 HP motor would have been fine. My goal is to spare my nice cordless drills and maybe save time.
View attachment 679033View attachment 679034
Different v-belt pulleys are easy to get. But now it got me thinking of the effects of milling at higher RPMs. Will is work? Will it not produce consistent crush? I will have to run some tests. My other thought was some sort of speed controller. However, I assume that this is an AC induction type motor which will require changing the frequency of the input and not the voltage. Probably way more $$$ than new v-belt pulleys.Ugh - I was afraid those pulleys didn't look different enough.
I don't think those ratios are going to produce 300 rpm - which tbh is on the high side of the CW on desirable mill speed of around 180-200 rpm (said CW admittedly tends to ignore roller diameter, but let's move along).
Anyway, on a belt drive, pulley circumference is what matters.
Circumference is Pi * Diameter, so the 2" pulley circumference is ~ 6.25" while the 6" is 18.5", for a ratio of ~.33.
Given the motor will spin at a fixed 1725 rpm the mill will be spinning at roughly 570 rpm. No bueno.
A 1.5" drive pulley with a 12" driven pulley would be a good solution with the mill ending up around 215 rpm. Definitely in the acceptable range....
Cheers!
Ugh - I was afraid those pulleys didn't look different enough.
I don't think those ratios are going to produce 300 rpm - which tbh is on the high side of the CW on desirable mill speed of around 180-200 rpm (said CW admittedly tends to ignore roller diameter, but let's move along).
Anyway, on a belt drive, pulley circumference is what matters.
Circumference is Pi * Diameter, so the 2" pulley circumference is ~ 6.25" while the 6" is 18.5", for a ratio of ~.33.
Given the motor will spin at a fixed 1725 rpm the mill will be spinning at roughly 570 rpm. No bueno.
A 1.5" drive pulley with a 12" driven pulley would be a good solution with the mill ending up around 215 rpm. Definitely in the acceptable range....
Cheers!
I have noticed more torn and shredded husks when I mill at a high speed. For the most part, I ditched the drills because I had trouble maintaining a slow speed and have moved to just using the hand crank. I get a much better crush with almost all the hulls are intact. It's now just a little bit of exercise.Different v-belt pulleys are easy to get. But now it got me thinking of the effects of milling at higher RPMs. Will is work? Will it not produce consistent crush? I will have to run some tests. My other thought was some sort of speed controller. However, I assume that this is an AC induction type motor which will require changing the frequency of the input and not the voltage. Probably way more $$$ than new v-belt pulleys.![]()
I have noticed more torn and shredded husks when I mill at a high speed. For the most part, I ditched the drills because I had trouble maintaining a slow speed and have moved to just using the hand crank. I get a much better crush with almost all the hulls are intact. It's now just a little bit of exercise.
I have the hand crank for the mill but.......I'm milling 20# or so most of the time. I'm trying to shorten my brew dayI have noticed more torn and shredded husks when I mill at a high speed. For the most part, I ditched the drills because I had trouble maintaining a slow speed and have moved to just using the hand crank. I get a much better crush with almost all the hulls are intact. It's now just a little bit of exercise.
I've never kept track of the time, but it takes more time to weight the grain out than it does to mill it by hand. No more than 5-7 min for 10-12 lbs grist.A couple questions:
1 - How long does it take you to use the hand crank for about 10 lbs or so?
2 - What do you consider 'high speed'?
It never occurred to me to use the hand crank, but I'm usually not in a hurry and exercise is good. If it's a 20 minute job though, I'm sure it would get old pretty quickly. And my drill is variable speed with a lower setting of 0-450 rpm. I generally try to pull the trigger about 2/3 of the way, to get closer to 300 rpm, although I obviously can't hold it in the same exact spot the whole time. Is 300-450 rpm enough to tear/shred the husks, or are you talking more in terms of the 1,000 rpm that some drills have?
I have the hand crank for the mill but.......I'm milling 20# or so most of the time. I'm trying to shorten my brew day![]()