Custom 3.5-gallon Batch Size Kettle

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

EarlyAmateurZymurgist

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2013
Messages
518
Reaction score
139
I have been working on a custom kettle for brewing 3.5-gallon batches since rejoining the amateur brewing ranks a few months ago. I used to brew 5.5-gallon batches almost exclusively; however, that's just too much beer for my current needs. Three gallons (kegged) seems to be sweet spot between having too much beer to drink and not having enough beer to share with friends.

A problem encountered when purchasing gear to brew 3.5-gallon batches is that the commercially available brewing kettles are the wrong geometry. After careful consideration, I specified what I wanted in a base stockpot.

  • Correct size for brewing 3.5-gallon batches
  • 1:1 height to diameter ratio
  • Induction ready
  • Thick enough to weld

With my base specs in hand, I went about searching for a stockpot that fit my needs. I wound up selecting a Vollrath Optio 3506 27-Quart stockpot. I was not crazy about the idea of purchasing a Chinese-made stockpot, but Chinese manufacturers appear to have corned the market on commercial-grade induction ready stockpots (the induction ready Polar Ware stock pots are also made in China).

Another problem that I encountered while building a kettle that is tailored to brewing 3.5-gallon batches is that none of the off-the-shelf false bottoms fit my needs (I use whole cone hops exclusively). I ended up using a kettle screen (a.k.a. bazooka tube) for a couple of batches before breaking down and ordering a custom Jaybird false bottom and stand. NorCal met my specs perfectly. I specified a false bottom that was a 1/16th of an inch smaller than the actual inside diameter of the 3506 because no kettle is perfectly round. The false bottom in the Polar Ware brew pot that I owned back in the late nineties was so close to the inside diameter of the kettle that it was difficult to install and remove without marring the inside of the kettle.

The perforated false bottom stand that I received from NorCal did a great job of filtering out any hop petals that managed to find their way through the 0.03125" gap around the false bottom. It's a very good design; however, I decided that I wanted to replicate the configuration of the first commercially made brewing kettle that I owned and foolishly sold, which was a 38-quart St. Patrick's of Texas kettle. St. Patrick's (St. Pats) of Texas used to be a top-tier home brewing supplier. Lynn O'Conner and company sold kettles that were converted Vollrath 38 and 60-quart stockpots in the first half of the nineties. The attribute that I liked the most about the St. Pats 38-quart kettle was the false bottom. Unlike modern false bottoms that sit atop feet or a stand, St. Pats' false bottom design took advantage of the radius at the bottom of the stockpot. This configuration resulted in a much smaller amount of dead space between the false bottom and the bottom of the kettle (Blichmann Engineering copied and improved upon this design by adding a stepped bottom to their kettles). Dead space reduces the effective coil count on an immersion chilling.

With the above said, here's kettle:


Complete 3.5-Gallon Setup



Exterior Sanitary Weld/Ball Valve Close-up



Interior Weld (the weld was difficult to perform due to its location and the diameter of the stockpot)



Internal 3/8" NPT x 3/8" 37° AN Fitting



Jaybird False Bottom, 37° flared 3/8" 316 SS pickup tube, 3/8" SS 37° AN sleeve, and 3/8" SS 37° AN nut (I drilled the 7/16" hole in the Jaybird false bottom)



Pickup Tube Installed



Complete False Bottom Assembly (approximately 1/2" of dead space)




Additional Photos

Jaybird Stand (previous configuration)





Brewer's Edge Kettle Screen (previous configuration)



Mash Tun "Gut Shot"

 
Nice. I have a lot of respect for the guys who know that they don't need a full 5 or 10 gallon system. Most people think bigger is better....but there is something to be said for a small, well built and well thought out system.

No thermometer port on the BK?
 
I have never felt the need to have a thermometer on a brew kettle. The only temperature reading that I need to take is after chilling, and that operation can be performed using a sanitized thermometer. The downside to having a thermometer on a kettle is that it can make moving an immersion chiller around tricky.
 
Nice. I brew some 3.5 gallon batches because I have some 3 gallon kegs. The other nice thing about 3.5 gallon batches is that 5 gallon corny kegs make great fermenters.
 
Rough-looking used 5-gallon ball-lock soda kegs are $60.00 where I live (I remember when they were $10.00). Three-gallon AEB soda kegs are a little over $100.00. I am willing to pay an extra $40.00 or so dollars for a more portable and easier to store soda keg that fits my preferred batch size.

Another cool thing about 3-gallon batches is that white Encore 5-gallon food-grade buckets and lids cost around $4.00 at Wal-Mart, which is almost 1/4th the price of an Ale Pail and lid.
 
I have never felt the need to have a thermometer on a brew kettle. The only temperature reading that I need to take is after chilling, and that operation can be performed using a sanitized thermometer. The downside to having a thermometer on a kettle is that it can make moving an immersion chiller around tricky.

You're right about that...the 2" probe never really bothered me but I bet it's different in a smaller pot. I always like to watch the temp drop. You should be able to get some WICKED chill times with an IC in a small batch....another reason why smaller can be better. Lately I've been doing lots of stirring until I hit 90-100F....then give it a 15 minute rest. Amazing how crystal clear the wort is (I do use whirlfloc).
 
I am in the process of adding a stainless Jamil-O-Chill whirlpool tube to my 25' stainless steel immersion chiller. I figured that I would put the sizable investment in tools that I needed to be able to bend, cut, and swage the stainless steel pick up tube on the kettle to good use. Stainless steel tubing laughs at copper tubing bending and cutting tools.

I built two nice counterflow units a couple of months ago that I have yet to use. They are made to be used stacked with two different coolant sources. One chiller is wound clockwise while the other is wound counter-clockwise. I started to prep the clockwise chiller for chilling a batch, but then remembered how much I hate cleaning and sanitizing counterflow chillers. An immersion chiller is so darn easy to maintain.
 
Back
Top