Gnomebrewer
Well-Known Member
Until you have proof a hypothesis is nothing more than an unproven idea.
That is correct. Hence the word I used was 'possibility'. I'm not discounting an idea that hasn't been tested (AFAIK) either way. That IS how science works.
That is most certainly not the same logic and is (obviously) absurd. My logic is that there is something with anecdotal evidence and nothing disproving it (AFAIK). That makes it possible and worth testing. The idea that the minuscule amount of pressure from an airlock could cause a stalled ferment is, IMO, not worth testing as it's so extremely unlikely.With the same logic you could say that you firmly believe that dragons could exist until someone publishes a study proving otherwise.
And of course primary fermentation and bottle carbonation are exactly the same
This is the statement that is not correct. I've given two valid reasons why they are different, but you choose to skim past them. Also, there are cases of stalled ferments being bottled, only to then continue fermenting in the bottle eating the priming sugar and remaining sugars from the stalled ferment. But that of course is impossible if primary fermentation and bottle carbonation are exactly the same.
Could a small amount of oxygen during fermentation help the ferment of notorious stallers such as WY3724? Maybe not, but I'm not completely discounting it.