Chili. Beans or no beans

[FireBrewer]

Many beers that go as IPA's are far from what a traditional English IPA is. They are still IPA's.

But, they aren't true English IPAs.

Right, they're American IPAs, which are better. Ergo, chili evolved with beans is better.

 

[Sean]

Also not chili.

And hey, does anybody really want to argue with these guys??!!

But that's all you two made was that little bitty pot?? That's like two big cans of Homel..Hardly worth the effort.

 

[BlindLemonLars]

But that's all you two made was that little bitty pot?? That's like two big cans of Homel..Hardly worth the effort.

That's a 15 gallon pot, my friend and I are both "little people."

Actually, that pot was for "taster chili," samples of which we'd give out to the looky-loos that come by. At cookoffs, they often sell wristbands at the gate, that entitle visitors to sample. We'd usually make it with the same spices, but use ground beef instead of the good cuts of beef.

 

[Sean]

Ever tried your hand at Gumbo, Lars??

 

[Jamo99]

I wanna see pictures of chili in somebody's keggle.

I have to agree, no beans. I've eaten and made it with both, and will again depending, but no beans if you want to be official. Meat wise, I usually do stew beef cubed, pork country ribs cubed, then a ground meatloaf mix of ground beef, veal, and pork.

 

[BlindLemonLars]

Ever tried your hand at Gumbo, Lars??

Never have...gotta recipe? Guess I'd have to find some filé.