AZ_IPA said:
I agree. Why did you have late payments? Credit card fraud shouldn't affect you paying the bill.
AZ_IPA said:
I recieved the coupon, but unfortunately had already ordered 100+ the week before. I had a pain in the ass filling out paperwork to get things straight, but its water under the bridge now. My CC company caught it early, but a couple charges did get through.
Hey Forrest, how about giving me a coupon for April or May when I will actually need more supplies? If not I want to donate my coupon to someone here who can use it!!![]()
Couldn't agree more. Had some fraud charges after my order in Jan. but even the acknowledgement they sent out meant a lot; the 10% coupon was over the top.
I agree. Why did you have late payments? Credit card fraud shouldn't affect you paying the bill.
I got the same email.My account was one of the ones compromised. I didn't let that stop me from doing business with them though.
I use my debit card for buying beer supplies, so my account is now empty even though I thought the bank cancelled the fraudulent purchases. Its hard to pay rent with 23 dollars and my landlord isn't very receptive to the idea of late payments. Its a pain in the ass but the money will be returned at some point so im not really worried about that.
I guess its time to stop being an idiot and get a credit card for online purchases.
I don't see why I should continue to support a company that lost my debit information.
As for AHS loosing your debit information, where did you get your information from that AHS actually lost it? I don't think it was "lost", but rather it was stolen. And more importantly, it was not necessarily stolen from AHS, but more likely from the credit card processor (which is where quite a bit of "unresolved" fraud happens). I say "unresolved" because to the consumer, it is the merchants fault and there is nothing the merchant can really do to change that perception. To the merchant, they did everything that they were supposed to do. A company that was paid my the merchant to be secure with the processing of the charges screwed up. I understand, as stated earlier in this thread, the consumer does not seperate the 2 services (merchant & processor) so it is impossible to really "resolve" the feelings in regards to who is responsible for what happened.
I believe Forrest when he says that he has done the investigating, and still went ahead and made changes to the website security, internal store procedures and switched merchant providers. His investagation did not reveal that the breach happed at the store level, but more likely at the processor level. What more can he do?