• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Alabama Homebrew Legislation 2013

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
They have to come up with a better way to answer that question when it gets to the Senate floor or we may see that amendment added and then it will have to go back to the house. It could actually have this thing shot down because of added costs to regulate... **sigh**

That's what I'm really worried about right now.
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cj5IFdapS8] Wat rong wit tha beer we got? [/ame]

Reminds me of the politicians I had to listen to when living in Birmingham. How do these ignorant folks get elected?
 
Alvin Holmes represents his constituents and works for their best interest. He comes off as ignorant, but he gets the job done for his district. I've listened to him quite a bit over the last couple of years and he is actually quite astute in his own way.
 
Ha!

stay thirstyII.jpg
 
HB9 got a first reading in the Senate today. It was referred to committee.

I thought the SB already made it through committee, or did the language in the HB change? I thought if the language in the bills was the same, you could replace one with the other if it advanced further. My question is clear as mud I realize....

Regardless, I'm glad the bill is advancing.
 
I thought the SB already made it through committee, or did the language in the HB change? I thought if the language in the bills was the same, you could replace one with the other if it advanced further. My question is clear as mud I realize....

Regardless, I'm glad the bill is advancing.

That was my (apparently incorrect) understanding, as well.

In fact, I thought that the Senate version had already been through committee.

Shows what I know.
 
I thought the SB already made it through committee, or did the language in the HB change? I thought if the language in the bills was the same, you could replace one with the other if it advanced further. My question is clear as mud I realize....

Regardless, I'm glad the bill is advancing.

I thought that also. BUT I was wrong. Here's what I was told: "The points of dual bills are (1) if one house is ready to work the bill before the other, you don't have to worry that your bill is in the wrong house (i.e., you get as big a head start as possible). And (2) HB9 should be a no-brainer through committee, as the committee has already figured it out with SB171."


The suspense is killing me. Any new news? I cannot find anything.

We are #1 on a schedule of 3 bills to be considered by the JC&ED committee on Wednesday at 11:00am. Seeing as the bill is identical to SB171, which this committee recently passed, there is no reason that they shouldn't move this bill on along it's way.
 
Not related to homebrewing, but of interest; HB530 would allow brewpubs and micros to sell growlers. Bill is sponsored by reps Ball and Mask
 
This needs to pass, too.

Yes, it does. Of course, it will meet opposition simply because it removes a certain restriction on the sale of alcohol. But what does this restriction actually do for us? It tells the consumer, "No, you cannot take this growler home. Your only option is to sit here, drink a pitcher, and then drive home."

I've never done a scientific survey, but I'm pretty sure almost all homebrew is consumed at home too.
 
I'm sure most of you have heard already but for those that haven't:
The Legislature opted to meet today, so all Senate committee meetings were canceled, delaying the expected committee approval of HB9.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top