JKoravos
Well-Known Member
Replace C. bot with something aerobic that produces heat-stable toxins...
Let us know when you find one.
Replace C. bot with something aerobic that produces heat-stable toxins...
Please describe your sanitary beer homebrewing setup. What is your cleaning procedure?A little background for those who don't know me. By day, I'm a manufacturing/engineering manager in a large dairy plant. By large, I mean we go through 2 million pounds of milk a day.
Any kind of threaded fitting poses a harborage risk. That's why we don't allow threaded fittings on any surface that makes product contact. 3A sanitary design standards don't even allow a non-radiused 90-degree corner inside a tank. Maybe if you go at every threaded fitting with a toothbrush and cleaner, you can get a pipe thread truly clean.
Saying that there is "no risk" with a weldless or threaded fitting is incorrect. Period.
Here's a practical example:
1) Joe Brewer makes a batch of beer. After he's done, he cleans his mash tun, but there's a couple of grain flecks that get hung up around the threaded fitting in the pickup off his false bottom in his mash tun cooler. He does all the usual cleaning. Those flecks are still there.
2) He stores the mash tun in his garage. Before everything's dry, a spore of something nasty like C. Botulinum blows by and ends up landing in the tun. Since there's some moisture, a little bit of grain to eat, and the temperature is comfy, the spore wakes up, clones itself into a small colony, eats that speck up, makes some toxins, and goes back into dormant spore form.
3) Next week, Joe goes to make another batch. He sprays everything down with StarSan before he goes to mash. Since he cleaned up after the last run, it must be OK, right? Nope. StarSan isn't going to affect the toxin. It may or may not kill off the spores.
4) Worst case, there are still some viable spores - they end up in the boil. Boil doesn't phase them. They have a chance to grow again during cooling once the temperature gets below about 125F or so. If Joe doesn't pitch enough starter, the bacteria might be able to grow a little more and make some more toxins.
If you had an all-sanitary system, that harborage point in the mash tun wouldn't exist.
Replace C. bot with something aerobic that produces heat-stable toxins and you're housed.
Does the Bayou Classic have a flat bottom?
It doesn't exist for normal beer
http://books.google.com/books?id=hB...nepage&q=Bacillus cereus beer brewing&f=false
The point that myself and others here are trying to make is that these types of toxins are VERY rarely if ever seen in home brewing. Mostly because of a combination of factors including the boiling of wort, the low ph, the preservative nature of hops, the presence of alcohol, etc. Not saying it couldn't happen, but the possibility for this type of infection is rare.
To get back to the original topic that fueled this, it's a stretch to make an argument in home brewing for using sanitary fittings to prevent this type of infection. Yes they're nice and don't have all the nooks & crannies for stuff to hide, but when you look at the rest of a brew rig that includes barbed hose fittings, threaded pump fittings, pump head internals, plate chillers, false bottoms, etc. there are just too many other areas that could allow potential nasties to breed. The bottom line is that either welded sanitary fittings or o-ring based weldless fittings are just fine for home brewing and using one over the other is not going to get you out of the risk of an infection.
Please describe your sanitary beer homebrewing setup. What is your cleaning procedure?
Try again. Doesn't exist in beer doesn't mean it can't grow in wort. It just won't grow once a certain alcohol content is reached.
rockfish42 said:Nothing pathogenic can survive fermentation at a concentration large enough to harm a person given normal homebrewing practices. I'm a biologist.
If you'd like I can go into a long screed tomorrow about it with citations and everything.![]()
I'm not trying to start anything here...but why do you like the thick aluminum clad bottoms? Other than the better heat distribution while heating...which is better but not worth the extra money probably unless you plan on turning on the cooker and taking a nap. I'm not saying you have to baby SS kettles without clad bottoms but I tend not to leave anything cooking by itself unattended unless I'm cooking something in a crock pot or smoker.
I was just curious considering breweries don't use aluminum clad bottoms (usually a current in the boiler), many homebrewers use converted SS kegs that don't have alum clad bottoms...etc.
Megapots (Priced from Northern Brewer)
10 Gallon MegaPot - MegaPots - Brew Kettles - Equipment - Brewing : Northern Brewer
10G Plain Stock Pot - $132.99 13H x 17W
10G - (weldless w/ Ball Valve and Thermometer) - $219.99 13H x 17W
Pros heavy duty, DIY option available
Cons weldless (a con to me), shaped like a can of tuna instead of can of soup doesnt fit my rig
Mega Pot offers an 8 gallon (just like B3), but I eliminate it for reasons I listed above. Basically, I find it undersized. The plain 10G Mega Pot is a great option for someone who can weld, or is brave enough to drill a hole in their new $130 kettles. I am neither of those things. The weld less option with thermometer puts you in the normal price range, but as odd as this seems, I really wanted welded fittings. Also, the ratio of height to width was a far cry from what I am used to, so I was a little scared the dramatically increased surface area would screw with my boil off and dead space. Also, the 17 width of these kettles didnt really work with my existing rig. For someone else, the weld less feature and low height may be the two biggest selling points, but for me, they were the deal breakers. On the flip side, for someone who can weld, the stock pot option is a very inexpensive way to get the features of the 10G Polar Ware kettle I will be talking about later but with a kettle shaped more squat than tall.
@BDJohns
Give it up bro...people are presenting you with facts, common sense, and the statistical fact that there is not even a minority of cases of these infections in beer...your hijacking this thread.
I want to pull the trigger in the next two weeks on a kettle, any good stout reviews out there? Thanks for the info so far
Megapots are Update International SPS line pots. For example: http://www.waresdirect.com/products/Restaurant-Supply/Update-International-/60-Qt168824. To be fair: you should add this pot to your review because then the brewer can decide on weldless or welded, and placement of fittings. And: I got three 80qt pots and had fittings welded on way cheaper than I could have bought three megapots for that I would have had to have more welding work done anyway.
I haven't found that to be the case, I have both a 10 gallon kettle and a 15.5 gallon keggle. For your statement to be true, you have to assume that the boiloff rate per hour would be twice at much for 10 gallons as it would be for 5. That hasn't been my experience. While a 10 gallon batch may boil off more hour than a 5 gallon batch, it's not significantly more.
Good review, btw.
Im looking into upgrading from my 5 gallon pot to an 8. I brew on my stove top (electric) I mostly brew 5 gallon batches (18.5L) and I probably wont brew more then that for now.
Should I go with an 8 gallon or a 10?